Re: [yam] IESG feedback on draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation
Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Thu, 14 January 2010 21:46 UTC
Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5D33A6908; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:46:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FJsqKaDrZQ1O; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:46:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D0D3A67FC; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:46:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.2.141] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <S0-QsABYj31k@rufus.isode.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:46:27 +0000
Message-ID: <4B4F908E.8070202@isode.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:45:50 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20100114111027.08246900@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20100114111027.08246900@elandnews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@sun.com>, iesg@ietf.org, yam@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [yam] IESG feedback on draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:46:36 -0000
S Moonesamy wrote: > Dear IESG, > > draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation was submitted for IESG > Evaluation on September 12, 2009. The issues raised by the IESG were > referred to the YAM WG on October 31, 2009 ( > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00147.html ). Ned > Freed posted some comments ( > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00149.html ) on > November 2, 2009 about RFC 1652 and they have been addressed in > draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-02 ( > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00267.html ). > > I believe that RFC 1652 has been thoroughly reviewed for advancement > from Draft to Full Standard by the YAM WG. The results have been > communicated to the IESG in > draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-02. The draft was on the > agenda of the IESG for the January 14, 2010 telechat. The YAM WG > requests feedback from the IESG, in particular: An official message from IESG should be coming any time now.
- [yam] IESG feedback on draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-… S Moonesamy
- Re: [yam] IESG feedback on draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652… Alexey Melnikov