IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yam] Issue #10: RFC 5321 3.9: add tiny subsection

SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 10 December 2009 00:35 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2B63A684C for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:35:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9TY1KwEWobOb for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:35:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619963A67F2 for <yam@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:35:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from subman.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.4.Beta0/8.14.4.Beta0) with ESMTP id nBA0ZLqC013726 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:35:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1260405329; x=1260491729; bh=ypBWRmBJndKdVuRGi/BPAPrTEnAehmJ2bgZhf1GVqwE=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=QBl8muLohNS7f+0qdeak1iskS1IGN48XYsD5ccDxK/AXLdw+rz+DHbCzZHJG0q8/R 4Hef9DjiRKVzBIbxqFRxk7goAcqkV+sGnuSumY7t+3x0ifC/pi2OCQwdKKGUkW2Tb0 sRFfdaltnVDX0bAXo6H3PXbahWTytct1Q0+LxL74=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=McxgZwVt35d9Ts4H+HLPGRlHnfjU9q5CqzUsGQowd1wD8gDgcEAxCBWBFZjb4OWX9 0n+qy4A2LpKmoJfDBv/h2xYy/dMm8IAlWuykyfBONQklU7HCi+OKytXX7CV0ZW+PocB dJhAUSaB29C5yDbKqcP/4wmVQEZg/f0rxGj6Syk=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20091209155607.032eff40@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:31:11 -0800
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4B1FC47F.40103@tana.it>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20091206014538.033cdcc8@elandnews.com> <4B1BE2D5.9010405@tana.it> <6.2.5.6.2.20091206102946.04601b90@resistor.net> <01NGXSHS3NUQ0000BI@mauve.mrochek.com> <4B1CDDE8.2090100@tana.it> <6.2.5.6.2.20091207072413.047ff4a0@resistor.net> <4B1E0967.1040006@tana.it> <6.2.5.6.2.20091208135556.030cfb28@resistor.net> <4B1FC47F.40103@tana.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: yam@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [yam] Issue #10: RFC 5321 3.9: add tiny subsection
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:35:43 -0000

Hi Alessandro,
At 07:38 09-12-2009, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>These cases are interesting for privacy issues. Since it is legally 
>different if I send to a list rather than type or select from my 
>personal address book each recipient, one may warn that by changing 
>envelope addresses an intermediary server may violate the final 
>recipients' privacy. Would that belong to the Security 
>Considerations section, then?

There is some discussion about information disclosure in Section 
7.  Please don't read this as meaning that the section should be or 
not be changed.

>You mean SPF authorization?

I mean authorization in general terms.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email