IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yam] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6409 (3995)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 22 May 2014 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E181A01A6 for <yam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2014 08:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y1JuJFQ8jTtP for <yam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2014 08:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x234.google.com (mail-qc0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3456A1A016D for <yam@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2014 08:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id i17so6086809qcy.11 for <yam@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2014 08:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/APGJpFMP0N/8BVITX4SruiNTS4sH68BpwjWgd9BxFY=; b=JaSQCF/uefV+ugE6GZ1to/xqBggzAwvNdQSczDGL3y8Avt+IrjQ0RWkfhEtI5Yemw4 8rBknbMenccZatCHrjxUGsfq+IXXv0TUFyJOH7nbZQlkz2BfEutQq/pRRVScn/c4VeAH nqUgT6aCZvxbPg8X3sUhTCsMOMRfB3L7MHLa8++QDd3sY/lROAr//W3JpeeDBZeEACUq Xt5Dv1yD1uXPRUsKbXfCXmQZl7hkCXgmzQpLPqnl7bvvq7d1N5ZrY0rSVJBub8plxy8q HsfUVFrl4RPBuy+WYsDjbqGegxjFtU7uOAoebQUNK+3iV7P3dHcPY5I+9bOkfsDdJDog HVvQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.42.12 with SMTP id b12mr14160423qga.109.1400773202473; Thu, 22 May 2014 08:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.224.99.1 with HTTP; Thu, 22 May 2014 08:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4EFB403085AB3DD86EAABE47@JCK-EEE10>
References: <20140522105930.779E218000D@rfc-editor.org> <01P83PLDKT58000052@mauve.mrochek.com> <4EFB403085AB3DD86EAABE47@JCK-EEE10>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 11:40:02 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5Hn9R5tP5o50FFxZW48mV7_AV0Y
Message-ID: <CALaySJJqcqZVZd=dOkJb-cMqW+yqUX3_P=FOO4k=6Ngf-K2i0Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yam/dbEqmmJQygEkhbwD9P15aBk471s
Cc: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, yam@ietf.org, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>, SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [yam] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6409 (3995)
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 15:40:05 -0000

>> This looks correct to me, although it's right at the edge of
>> what's acceptable in an errata.
>
> Yeah.  Reluctantly concur.  I am not aware of any impulses
> toward updating 6409 and do not believe this report changes that.

Two votes for "Verified" (along with my own sense) is good enough for me.

/me goes off to do it...

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email