[yam] [Errata Verified] RFC6409 (3995)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 03 June 2014 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E2D1A0262; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 11:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.853
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.853 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CoBnLBLajQtG; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 11:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460F01A0249; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 11:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B037A18000F; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 11:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
To: dot@dotat.at, rg+ietf@qualcomm.com, john-ietf@jck.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140603183654.B037A18000F@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:36:54 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yam/gbLaYh08HPZxKzOt0yro8okoW0Y
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, barryleiba@computer.org, iesg@ietf.org, yam@ietf.org
Subject: [yam] [Errata Verified] RFC6409 (3995)
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 18:37:54 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC6409,
"Message Submission for Mail". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6409&eid=3995

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Date Reported: 2014-05-22
Verified by: Barry Leiba (IESG)

Section: 8.7

Original Text
-------------
   NOTE: SMTP [SMTP-MTA] prohibits the use of domain name aliases in
   addresses and the session-opening announcement.  As with other SMTP
   requirements, RFC 5321 effectively prohibits an MSA from forwarding
   such messages into the public Internet.  Nonetheless, unconditionally
   resolving aliases could be harmful.  For example, if www.example.net
   and ftp.example.net are both aliases for mail.example.net, rewriting
   them could lose useful information.


Corrected Text
--------------
   NOTE: RFC 821 and RFC 1123 prohibited the use of domain name
   aliases in addresses and the session-opening announcement.
   Because of this it is still common for MTAs to canonicalize
   domains in email addresses.  However this requirement was dropped
   during the development of RFC 2821.  The current rules about 
   domain name aliases are set out in RFC 5321 section 2.3.5.

Notes
-----
This errata report is correct, but the above wording is not quite correct and needs to be examined carefully before a revised version goes into a revised document.

--------------------------------------
RFC6409 (draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-03)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Message Submission for Mail
Publication Date    : November 2011
Author(s)           : R. Gellens, J. Klensin
Category            : INTERNET STANDARD
Source              : Yet Another Mail
Area                : Applications
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG