Re: [yam] STD 72, RFC 6409 on Message Submission for Mail
Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Wed, 16 November 2011 16:20 UTC
Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E373421F8E16 for <yam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:20:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kO+evCx8SrjE for <yam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:20:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail120.messagelabs.com (mail120.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C03C21F8E2B for <yam@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:20:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Env-Sender: tony@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-120.messagelabs.com!1321460402!49475254!1
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.145]
X-StarScan-Version: 6.3.6; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 10159 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2011 16:20:03 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp6.sbc.com (HELO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.145) by server-9.tower-120.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 16 Nov 2011 16:20:03 -0000
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAGGKUxf008913 for <yam@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:20:30 -0500
Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAGGKNbs008812 for <yam@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:20:24 -0500
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAGGJt9p006975 for <yam@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:19:55 -0500
Received: from dns.maillennium.att.com (mailgw1.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAGGJqoS006911 for <yam@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:19:53 -0500
Received: from [130.10.36.15] (vpn-130-10-36-15.vpn.west.att.com[130.10.36.15]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20111116161853gw100e4leme> (Authid: tony); Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:18:54 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [130.10.36.15]
Message-ID: <4EC3E2A6.9060204@att.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:19:50 -0500
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
References: <20111116093558.0C778B1E007@rfc-editor.org> <4EC38DF2.7000001@att.com> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C15090@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C15090@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "yam@ietf.org" <yam@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [yam] STD 72, RFC 6409 on Message Submission for Mail
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:20:06 -0000
Yes, I wrote the message during that conversation of the plenary. :-) On 11/16/2011 5:23 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: yam-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:yam-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tony Hansen >> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 2:18 AM >> To: yam@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [yam] STD 72, RFC 6409 on Message Submission for Mail >> >> With the publication of 6409, I believe that YAM's business is >> concluded. I expect to see the official wheels cranking through soon >> for us to shut down. > That's funny. Are you listening to the plenary?
- [yam] STD 72, RFC 6409 on Message Submission for … rfc-editor
- Re: [yam] STD 72, RFC 6409 on Message Submission … Tony Hansen
- Re: [yam] STD 72, RFC 6409 on Message Submission … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [yam] STD 72, RFC 6409 on Message Submission … Frank Ellermann
- Re: [yam] STD 72, RFC 6409 on Message Submission … Tony Hansen