IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yam] 4 days left in WGLC of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Tue, 08 September 2009 02:38 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809DF28C132 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 19:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.33
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.33 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.269, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GI9sfGPy7TRS for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 19:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail121.messagelabs.com (mail121.messagelabs.com [216.82.242.3]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963193A68F6 for <yam@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 19:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: tony@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-121.messagelabs.com!1252377563!30357861!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.1.3; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.112.25]
Received: (qmail 32683 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2009 02:39:24 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp3.sbc.com (HELO tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com) (144.160.112.25) by server-10.tower-121.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 8 Sep 2009 02:39:24 -0000
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n882dNI9003967 for <yam@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 21:39:23 -0500
Received: from klpd017.kcdc.att.com (klpd017.kcdc.att.com [135.188.40.86]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n882dKf3003950 for <yam@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 21:39:21 -0500
Received: from kcdc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by klpd017.kcdc.att.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n882dKwk009015 for <yam@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 21:39:20 -0500
Received: from maillennium.att.com (mailgw1.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by klpd017.kcdc.att.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n882dDDr008985 for <yam@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 21:39:15 -0500
Received: from [135.70.85.247] (vpn-135-70-85-247.vpn.swst.att.com[135.70.85.247]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20090908023912gw1003ibrhe> (Authid: tony); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 02:39:13 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.85.247]
Message-ID: <4AA5C3D0.5050800@att.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 22:39:12 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20090903142447.02f80810@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20090903142447.02f80810@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: yam@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [yam] 4 days left in WGLC of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 02:38:57 -0000

The WGLC ends soon. These are the only comments that have been made on 
draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00 before it goes to the IESG.

Any responses to these questions, or other issues to bring up?

	Tony Hansen
	tony@att.com

S Moonesamy wrote:
> This is a summary of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00 issues:
> 
> 14 Aug 2009 - Tony made a comment about the IANA mail-parameters registry.
> 
> 16 Aug 2009 - Tony started a discussion about a deployment report for 
> 8BITMIME
> 
> 17 Aug 2009 - Alexey proposed using the RFC 5234 syntax for ABNF
> 
> Please comment on the above.  If there are any other issues (e.g. 
> proposed changes, non-changes, etc.) or comments on the template layout 
> or text, please post them to this mailing list.
> 
> The Working Group Last Call ends on ending on September 11.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email