Re: [yam] STD 72, RFC 6409 on Message Submission for Mail

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Wed, 16 November 2011 10:23 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D55621F94BF for <yam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:23:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.81
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.81 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.211, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MlJxHvkV+OWT for <yam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:23:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1111D21F94BE for <yam@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:23:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by spite.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.72]) with mapi; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:23:08 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "yam@ietf.org" <yam@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:23:05 -0800
Thread-Topic: [yam] STD 72, RFC 6409 on Message Submission for Mail
Thread-Index: AcykSSdlkE3gzzaBQKmjqHFbxP2MswAAIqUQ
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C15090@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20111116093558.0C778B1E007@rfc-editor.org> <4EC38DF2.7000001@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EC38DF2.7000001@att.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [yam] STD 72, RFC 6409 on Message Submission for Mail
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:23:09 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: yam-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:yam-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tony Hansen
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 2:18 AM
> To: yam@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [yam] STD 72, RFC 6409 on Message Submission for Mail
> 
> With the publication of 6409, I believe that YAM's business is
> concluded. I expect to see the official wheels cranking through soon
> for us to shut down.

That's funny.  Are you listening to the plenary?