Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS?

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Wed, 20 January 2010 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@ISI.EDU>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E200B3A6855 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:13:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.582
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ol5d1VhEZVEY for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:13:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nitro.isi.edu (nitro.isi.edu [128.9.208.207]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F373A68F6 for <yam@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:13:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.95] (pool-71-106-88-10.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.106.88.10] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by nitro.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0KFC8fE024891 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:12:09 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B571D48.1090408@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:12:08 -0800
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
References: <201001192042.VAA24070@TR-Sys.de> <01NINCMHCJIW004042@mauve.mrochek.com> <4B56C4D8.3090103@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <BB76B773-67C8-416E-871A-358D1CEAE529@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <BB76B773-67C8-416E-871A-358D1CEAE529@nokia.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MailScanner-ID: o0KFC8fE024891
X-ISI-4-69-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@icann.org>, "yam@ietf.org" <yam@ietf.org>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [yam] draft-daboo-srv-email: POP3S/IMAPS?
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:13:45 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Lars Eggert wrote:
...
>> My suggestion would be to add a section to that draft grandfathering 
>> ports 465, 993, 2000 and a few more (adding as much negative verbiage as 
>> seems wise; I don't think the exact amount makes any difference at all). 
>> IIRC port 2000 can be grandfathered a half-dozen times.

There are two separate issues:

- - previous assignments that don't follow the proposed recommendations
	- as noted, there's no goal to fix that

- - 'squatting', or use of ports without registering through IANA
	- IMO, these should not be ignored, but clearly cannot be
	treated as equivalent to 'self assigned'

	i.e., IMO, IANA should list these as "unauthorized use",
	as a service to the community to help those using those
	ports as assigned.

I would expect the draft might address both issues.

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAktXHUgACgkQE5f5cImnZrur0wCgrEKpARNefyRROwqpZSLeS39H
JlYAoPcevBtqqK0fW4kmR41xVKPqATm8
=VHin
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----