Re: [yam] swapping YAM and MORG?

SM <sm@resistor.net> Sun, 21 February 2010 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B219E3A7349 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:10:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.445
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.445 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.154, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jfKEka7oFKs5 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:10:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B713A72CE for <yam@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:10:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o1LKBnZu007553 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <yam@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:12:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1266783125; x=1266869525; bh=b72LMYz9t7NSM7Ke/wcOW8MKOgj+IiflOYdgtPfZyRk=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=dhu2akjBTC7wmkRLz0If4Z+c0WL2NMjOyYENkjfD3gMb5YCbvTRHXEE5Kz6M84lGw fP5baOqlPVNCVvorLcC914muPFbOiijhOgaNlE4FzfUHpEAutmKugY79Jz8D+Qmsjx DYVwF4un8H5JwIHaUAdnWBz9xfvqJ3FVYo1Z9FkM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=2pQsT2Y2p3yOza3aq9IPu4nAsaxWvnUVSUqQfx3Y/HelVsC/OysUBOhAkbtS5fVGh STWKs8g6wvICJaRURj6YTmvE1BXpMi9peSWoyqKK26XOl6ec29gnDG5oNMqPtJtU2cf gDTkCUaWJds8YsPzSlVrskg7kj4Ug0xbQMYyfPc=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20100221120642.092c0f98@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:11:36 -0800
To: Yet Another Mail Working Group <yam@ietf.org>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4B814C3E.3050203@att.com>
References: <4B814C3E.3050203@att.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [yam] swapping YAM and MORG?
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:10:11 -0000

Hi Tony,
At 07:07 21-02-10, Tony Hansen wrote:
>We've received a request to swap YAM and MORG's time slots. This 
>would put it in the Wednesday 3:10 PM slot instead:
>
>Wednesday
>1510-1610 Afternoon Session II
> >>>California B         APP     morg    Message Organization WG<<<
> >>> Proposed timeslot for YAM <<<

That's fine with me.

Regards,
-sm