Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02: (with DISCUSS)
S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 24 August 2011 19:55 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDCE21F8A66 for <yam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zE7MqxoUHdvn for <yam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.elandsys.com (mail.elandsys.com [208.69.177.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8706F21F8A64 for <yam@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.233.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.elandsys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7OJuoYn023186; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:56:59 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1314215821; bh=K1+hJmAUzlfBwMKQ939gVTXQETc=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=lOch6PisgaiW96zENhLfYVoPfMqHsDE9zHCQ3CkdRd/p/zY65AqhqKwT/EL2Tw3fV 8g8PwyFfnxXHeZ1XDadayuwNUoU/rI4+N3bt0CceVbaMLc4pEhscKIBnD/jokszQgQ W5Dy82F3wXOO0BcUeYniOCh1hnGQ7Ol9Mzi5LR18=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20110824123635.0b1f18b8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:56:41 -0700
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <01O588HO49YO00VHKR@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <20110822174540.26398.33846.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110823123557.0d863778@elandnews.com> <D41B604F-9452-4F9F-80BA-1FE5B74B171E@vigilsec.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110824111447.076ffd08@elandnews.com> <01O588HO49YO00VHKR@mauve.mrochek.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: yam@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 19:55:57 -0000
Hi Ned, At 12:25 24-08-2011, Ned Freed wrote: >That's not correct. The original text was worded fairly differently, also >referenced S/MIME, and mentioned the possibility of other signiatures. I meant the previous replacement text that was suggested. >I don't have a problem with the approach the new text takes, but I don't >understand why the reference to S/MIME was dropped. It seems likely >it was an unintentional omission, and if so I suggest it be restored. The reference to S/MIME may have been dropped unintentionally. I am copying Dave as he suggested the replacement text. I noticed the omission. I did not ask about it as nobody raised it as an issue. I used text from your message [1] to respond to the DISCUSS. It looks like I misread your message; you were actually arguing for the original text to be retained without the compliance language. Would this work for you: "Message modification can affect the validity of an existing message signature, such as by DKIM [DKIM], PGP [RFC4880], S/MIME [RFC5751] and can render the signature invalid. This, in turn, can affect message handling by later receivers, such as filtering engines that consider the presence or absence of a valid signature." If you would like to suggest any change, I am open to it. I'll wait a few hours in case the WG would like to comment. Regards, S. Moonesamy YAM WG co-chair 1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00756.html
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… S Moonesamy
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… Russ Housley
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… S Moonesamy
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… Pete Resnick
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… Ned Freed
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… S Moonesamy
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… Ned Freed
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… John C Klensin
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… Ned Freed
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… John C Klensin
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… John C Klensin
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… S Moonesamy
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… John C Klensin
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… Pete Resnick
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… S Moonesamy
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… Barry Leiba
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… Ned Freed
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… John Levine
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… Tony Hansen
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… SM
- Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-ya… S Moonesamy