Re: [yam] WGLC is now over for draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Sat, 12 September 2009 04:24 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD073A68D4 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.252, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hOpFZJazuwe4 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail161.messagelabs.com (mail161.messagelabs.com [216.82.253.115]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9823A683B for <yam@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: tony@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-161.messagelabs.com!1252729515!16300258!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.1.3; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.112.25]
Received: (qmail 25874 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2009 04:25:16 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp3.sbc.com (HELO tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com) (144.160.112.25) by server-4.tower-161.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 12 Sep 2009 04:25:16 -0000
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8C4PFRs012957 for <yam@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:25:15 -0500
Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8C4P8uq012431 for <yam@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:25:08 -0500
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8C4P8GR012760 for <yam@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:25:08 -0400
Received: from maillennium.att.com (dns.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8C4P6IJ012715 for <yam@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:25:06 -0400
Received: from [135.70.252.199] (vpn-135-70-252-199.vpn.east.att.com[135.70.252.199]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20090912042505gw1003ibmve> (Authid: tony); Sat, 12 Sep 2009 04:25:06 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.252.199]
Message-ID: <4AAB229D.4060403@att.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:25:01 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: yam@ietf.org
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20090903142447.02f80810@elandnews.com> <4AA5C3D0.5050800@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AA5C3D0.5050800@att.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [yam] WGLC is now over for draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 04:24:38 -0000

The WGLC is now over for draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00.

Since there was *no* discussion about the two issues that were raised 
(IANA mail-parameters and ABNF changes), no further changes should be 
made to the document at this point.

This means that we need to proceed to the next step with the document as 
it currently stands. And that next step is to get Alexey to schedule the 
document for the soonest IESG telechat.

Alexey, SM has been collecting the deployment reports together that 
we've received so far. We'll be posting them to the wiki soon.

If anyone has any objections to this plan, please speak up now.

	Tony Hansen
	co-chair

Tony Hansen wrote:
> The WGLC ends soon. These are the only comments that have been made on 
> draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00 before it goes to the IESG.
> 
> Any responses to these questions, or other issues to bring up?
> 
>     Tony Hansen
>     tony@att.com
> 
> S Moonesamy wrote:
>> This is a summary of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00 issues:
>>
>> 14 Aug 2009 - Tony made a comment about the IANA mail-parameters 
>> registry.
>>
>> 16 Aug 2009 - Tony started a discussion about a deployment report for 
>> 8BITMIME
>>
>> 17 Aug 2009 - Alexey proposed using the RFC 5234 syntax for ABNF
>>
>> Please comment on the above.  If there are any other issues (e.g. 
>> proposed changes, non-changes, etc.) or comments on the template 
>> layout or text, please post them to this mailing list.
>>
>> The Working Group Last Call ends on ending on September 11.