IETF Logo Mail Archive

[yang-doctors] Question about implementation of yang modules for recently published RFC

Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@iana.org> Fri, 03 September 2021 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <michelle.cotton@iana.org>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6239A3A308E for <yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 15:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8XIDYqTmgMkl for <yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 15:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa3.lax.icann.org (ppa3.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA0393A3083 for <yang-doctors@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 15:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-E2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.7]) by ppa3.lax.icann.org (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with ESMTPS id 183M2W19003656 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <yang-doctors@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 22:02:32 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.858.15; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 15:02:31 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) with mapi id 15.02.0858.015; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 15:02:31 -0700
From: Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@iana.org>
To: "yang-doctors@ietf.org" <yang-doctors@ietf.org>
CC: Amanda Baber <amanda.baber@iana.org>, Sabrina Tanamal <sabrina.tanamal@iana.org>
Thread-Topic: Question about implementation of yang modules for recently published RFC
Thread-Index: AQHXoQ9knsg+YWYWuEeGG7spH3vjwA==
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 22:02:31 +0000
Message-ID: <731DAF81-C9DE-415C-9DBB-E56FAB6EC4F0@iana.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.36.20041300
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha256; boundary="B_3713526149_1665834288"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-09-03_07:2021-09-03, 2021-09-03 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/4Vgnzu4MJXspl-bDgCLJ_kmhoPk>
Subject: [yang-doctors] Question about implementation of yang modules for recently published RFC
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2021 22:02:39 -0000

Hello Yang Doctors!

 

Quick question about implementation of RFC 9132.

 

For the IANA maintained Yang, iana-dots-signal-channel, the RFC-Editor sent us a replacement yang file.

 

In this case, do we just delete the older yang file and completely replace it with the new one?

 

At https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters we point the iana-dots-signal-channel entry to the newer yang file.

 

Then we’ll update https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-dots-signal-channel/iana-dots-signal-channel.xhtml so that it points to the newer yang file and update the RFC.

 

Do we have that correct?

 

For the ietf-dots-signal-channel yang, an additional entry was added since it is not IANA maintained (per previous instructions from Benoit).

 

Thanks for any confirmation you can provide!

 

--Michelle

 

Michelle Cotton

Protocol Parameters Engagement Sr. Manger

IANA Services

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email