Re: [yang-doctors] Looking for YANG doctors' helping for a Mboned draft

Hi,

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
> Sandy,
> Early reviews aren’t done until, at a minimum, the document is adopted
> by a WG and the early review is requested by the chair. We don’t have
> the bandwidth for individual requests.

Actually, the YANG doctor's page says that we do (may) review
individual documents, but they are listed as:

   3.  non-WG document: best effort (really)

So it's not surprising if people ask for reviews.

In any case, I think such reviews are not done "offically", but rather
by individual YANG doctors, if they feel they have the time.

> Also, I didn’t think we were doing more information models in the
> IETF.

Is this a documented policy?

In any case, *if* you're doing an information model, I don't think you
should use YANG for that.  Use UML or text or something else.  Then if
you want to do a *data model* that is supposed to be implemented in a
server (at some level), write a YANG model.

/martin

> 
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
> From: yang-doctors
> <yang-doctors-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:yang-doctors-bounces@ietf.org>>
> on behalf of "zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn<mailto:zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn>"
> <zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn<mailto:zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn>>
> Date: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 2:36 AM
> To: YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org<mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>>
> Cc: "zzhang_ietf@hotmail.com<mailto:zzhang_ietf@hotmail.com>"
> <zzhang_ietf@hotmail.com<mailto:zzhang_ietf@hotmail.com>>,
> "gjshep@gmail.com<mailto:gjshep@gmail.com>"
> <gjshep@gmail.com<mailto:gjshep@gmail.com>>,
> "lenny@juniper.net<mailto:lenny@juniper.net>"
> <lenny@juniper.net<mailto:lenny@juniper.net>>,
> "rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com<mailto:rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>"
> <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com<mailto:rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>>
> Subject: [yang-doctors] Looking for YANG doctors' helping for a Mboned
> draft
> 
> 
> Dear YANG doctors,
> 
> 
> Could you please help us to do early review for
> "draft-zhang-mboned-multicast-info-model-02" in Mboned working group?
> 
> And could you please give us advice about if it is better that using
> mount points in this model?
> 
> Thank you very much!
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Sandy
> 
> 
> 原始邮件
> 发件人： <lenny@juniper.net<mailto:lenny@juniper.net>>;
> 收件人： <mboned@ietf.org<mailto:mboned@ietf.org>>;
> 日 期 ：2017年11月18日 05:22
> 主 题 ：[MBONED] Singapore MBONED meeting mins
> 
> Draft mins of the MBONED meeting in Singapore have been posted:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/materials/minutes-100-mboned/
> 
> Please take a look and let us know if you have any corrections or
> things
> to add.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> MBONED@ietf.org<mailto:MBONED@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
> 