Re: [yang-doctors] Dealing with BFD RFC 9127 client-cfg-parms for PIM, OSPF, ISIS and other BFD clients on some platforms

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Tue, 23 November 2021 22:09 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1263A0830; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:09:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id szSSjgq5afYd; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:09:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772B13A0833; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:09:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (99-59-193-67.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.59.193.67]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52E2B1E2F3; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:09:10 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_29E52448-2228-453C-8289-05B26D8C2D1A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <1955391532.2298500.1637704932304@mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:09:09 -0500
Cc: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>, "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, =?utf-8?Q?Martin_Bj=C3=B6rklund?= <mbj+ietf@4668.se>, "ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz" <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz>, "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>, "yang-doctors@ietf.org" <yang-doctors@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <5414E906-A1A0-4B9C-9ACD-204A81AF245A@pfrc.org>
References: <BY5PR11MB4196C864C6D23A4A2651342AB5939@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <0A207FB0-C39F-4198-8565-0BA6542F6E59@pfrc.org> <BY5PR11MB4196467831FC39D5971C6B95B59C9@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <41D23C55-AFA9-4040-B67D-3EE81688BE20@pfrc.org> <7B218D32-A783-42E2-8C05-6C2A8FCC2E34@juniper.net> <850727E4-0575-4A76-8A28-7BDC4CAE6119@pfrc.org> <8FB25E2A-3B0B-44AD-B46D-B50644F0CF2C@juniper.net> <C7307386-4849-46D6-AE7C-D03D785373E9@pfrc.org> <1955391532.2298500.1637704932304@mail.yahoo.com>
To: Reshad Rahman <reshad@yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/7705sSnZskXOLY5CM9TYMMcc05Q>
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] Dealing with BFD RFC 9127 client-cfg-parms for PIM, OSPF, ISIS and other BFD clients on some platforms
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 22:09:16 -0000

Thanks, Reshad.  That one wasn't top of my queue for the thread.

-- Jeff


> On Nov 23, 2021, at 5:02 PM, Reshad Rahman <reshad@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> And the subsequent thing we discussed is not having the refine at all but instead:
> use base-cfg-parms {
>   if-feature "client-cfg-parameters";
> }
> 
> On Tuesday, November 23, 2021, 04:52:43 PM EST, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Nov 23, 2021, at 4:20 PM, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net <mailto:jgs@juniper.net>> wrote:
>> 
> 
>> On Nov 23, 2021, at 11:59 AM, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org <mailto:jhaas@pfrc.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> If it helps move things along, we certainly can post the current diff.
> 
> It wouldn’t hurt.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> The attached is what we're working through.
> 
> The draft text is simple past that point.
> 
> -- Jeff
>