IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yang-doctors] Question about implementation of yang modules for recently published RFC

Martin Björklund <mbj+ietf@4668.se> Mon, 06 September 2021 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj+ietf@4668.se>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9883A0BFA for <yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 06:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=4668.se header.b=guOlgy+c; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Gm7x/U0/
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WaQWYxIXK-W5 for <yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 06:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A7FD3A0BF3 for <yang-doctors@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 06:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439C132008FC; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 09:52:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 06 Sep 2021 09:52:09 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=4668.se; h=date :message-id:to:cc:subject:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm2; bh= HvF0C3VXeAjkqhkJwEwK+RYKtzVfBhmuNPiF2clCuC4=; b=guOlgy+ctSg2eDw3 egntfxiWTHX/6P4g9O9MP3J9qiuMAeKWAeaExx4P/vaevtTK5brGwkrzUSp+iiza lKl6vS33UwJ+fXkL6wgNRCqEMn2/HFQW9zX/K/QmvZTmp/9s8e8Km8/OlNAanl4d m5BTsrT2FHJPm3eCkQwlziEEH70jwJFbPSIdPG7+k1m2d33/or5NlbF5IPZl9NWL p8T33+9twZcxVJFpRbX7BEpd5MTJoiYKKkONYXfpL23z5ASIQMKION1fuYzbL0G8 nOUpNZvF+GQRmGykcA2gPFJcWA2l0qMAd48Mfcx5HKP5TC3uk+pajwPwcE1ysBsg V4Eq6g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=HvF0C3VXeAjkqhkJwEwK+RYKtzVfBhmuNPiF2clCu C4=; b=Gm7x/U0/dLW8D8z2jtV17Kr47TGkyNKRHDThrBzF45t5s+LUBsjNCF6Rn pPjop70q0yj3GyuMYTwO9mv/uHSlWuQ9/x86PVClaTTQlAI6O9RClJlyJcbCOPWM q1NX06wZsx4NlOWo0xP/ZvhxdiDB4rbMSxc7uT67Zai6lWZa6wc7PdbGfEJnhGPG vxf4WsHDKTJj8zWlrQXPTtGekNpDVNFkTHRoBXVVtLyzAZhAE8uYcpfSp8JMz6S7 qITB9AqXVm0DERJdNfoO5qs14xpPqkH7AqDBt01xuT/lcg8FgOhZW50DlM/XyYpm cOILURV/gIXLKbNx2yzXIpdAoSZdA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:CB02YfEHjaY_MEprK_b8XAnIYoeGMptWrXO7IsrXmdrMj96H3EOpew> <xme:CB02YcUDUTdaXPNuwv0TpJQoocR8ipz4imyHITohNBtXzyc7NhyFXBPMGvHMVkgAL SJWQbsjbne7WmeMiBI>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:CB02YRLx3Z1YLADcXnoFcN5_QhoYi7KOh0t2rrY2b4Davt-rvQWayeR76SzUQqsQmSndvv15nnQzzfghmAyuOQXx3UuS9J2uhw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudeffedgjedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffkffvuffhjghfofggtgfgsehtsg ertdertdejnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrthhinhcuuehjnphrkhhluhhnugcuoehmsghjodhi vghtfhesgeeiieekrdhsvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepleehkeetfeekgfekgfeiud ehteelfeevteeuffelhfevgffggefghfdtkeehffehnecuffhomhgrihhnpehirghnrgdr ohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hmsghjodhivghtfhesgeeiieekrdhsvg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:CB02YdE8kbs4xi48qqjkI6vr1mWmkBeskWC-xNUOAOrqqKl6PgxPLQ> <xmx:CB02YVVvauRhMnH5XdIQjIYKUtAAMo6XapKYtv3Y_xCKtHfDyi_4Tg> <xmx:CB02YYNhmroAAQzg6wnwvBm_e-_xxouYrNaSlDkqjLNW20LC7RlptA> <xmx:CB02YSgy8iurpMo7dDojXLOQv48ue7K6C1w84yFSGqko-fmqEVO1ig>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 09:52:07 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 15:52:05 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <20210906.155205.514219278646645474.id@4668.se>
To: michelle.cotton@iana.org
Cc: yang-doctors@ietf.org, sabrina.tanamal@iana.org, amanda.baber@iana.org
From: Martin =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rklund?= <mbj+ietf@4668.se>
In-Reply-To: <731DAF81-C9DE-415C-9DBB-E56FAB6EC4F0@iana.org>
References: <731DAF81-C9DE-415C-9DBB-E56FAB6EC4F0@iana.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/9-stpZ-Btv-XO6CMkez_azOBJ2A>
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] Question about implementation of yang modules for recently published RFC
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 13:52:19 -0000

Hi,


Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@iana.org> wrote:
> Hello Yang Doctors!
> 
>  
> 
> Quick question about implementation of RFC 9132.
> 
>  
> 
> For the IANA maintained Yang, iana-dots-signal-channel, the RFC-Editor
> sent us a replacement yang file.
> 
>  
> 
> In this case, do we just delete the older yang file and completely
> replace it with the new one?

Yes I think that's the right procedure.  For iana-if-type.yang, that's
what you do everytime a new interface is added, so I think it is ok in
this case as well.

>  
> 
> At https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters we point the
> iana-dots-signal-channel entry to the newer yang file.
> 
>  
> 
> Then we’ll update
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-dots-signal-channel/iana-dots-signal-channel.xhtml
> so that it points to the newer yang file and update the RFC.
> 
>  
> 
> Do we have that correct?

Yes.


> 
> For the ietf-dots-signal-channel yang, an additional entry was added
> since it is not IANA maintained (per previous instructions from
> Benoit).

I don't understad if this comment is related to the question above...?


/martin


> 
>  
> 
> Thanks for any confirmation you can provide!
> 
>  
> 
> --Michelle
> 
>  
> 
> Michelle Cotton
> 
> Protocol Parameters Engagement Sr. Manger
> 
> IANA Services
> 
>  
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email