IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yang-doctors] guideline for enum and value?

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Thu, 25 January 2018 12:00 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767C412DA23 for <yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 04:00:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56MPqnUXw3WJ for <yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 04:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16B912DA28 for <yang-doctors@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 04:00:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.56]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0EDA1AE0442; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:00:04 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:00:04 +0100
Message-Id: <20180125.130004.259422860351840392.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
Cc: bclaise@cisco.com, einarnn@cisco.com, yang-doctors@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180125115326.okxwqlmpu3bpty6w@elstar.local>
References: <dfb94426-c408-e215-e23b-539e127050a2@cisco.com> <20180125.120804.68412726225731762.mbj@tail-f.com> <20180125115326.okxwqlmpu3bpty6w@elstar.local>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/DwLRryEwe3cevYrEAqomuq6ix10>
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] guideline for enum and value?
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 12:00:10 -0000

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:08:04PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > 
> > When you upgrade a module, I think we can assume that people read
> > section 11 of RFC 7950.
> >
> 
> Good luck with that.

I can rephrase:  It is as likely that people read section 11 of RFC
7950 as they read section XXX of RFC6087bis.


/martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email