Re: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-yang-09

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Wed, 21 February 2018 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009F71270AB; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:51:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ljJ22fl3uQ3c; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:51:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67439126DFB; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:51:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B4E311E2D4; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 09:57:21 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 09:57:21 -0500
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
Cc: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, "yang-doctors@ietf.org" <yang-doctors@ietf.org>, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bfd-yang.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bfd-yang.all@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180221145721.GE11941@pfrc.org>
References: <151868731494.7525.9572645824096052010@ietfa.amsl.com> <43251E1C-078C-49E6-9817-1743DC54AFED@cisco.com> <20180217085551.x7vn357slnmdwkzr@elstar.local> <727B078D-95F8-4D61-AD3E-6A9B884A1D4D@cisco.com> <9D82EBC0-CFC4-494D-83FD-4053542F237C@cisco.com> <9CF7CA53-427A-4DA3-982B-BCDA6A72FFB6@cisco.com> <6D6DEFD5-7EEA-4AF8-A56B-504D8BE5DB23@cisco.com> <CBCFED55-2F22-4C20-BBEA-707348365F86@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CBCFED55-2F22-4C20-BBEA-707348365F86@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/Gd4ghhxiMsv4ErW67mIChy6biMg>
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-yang-09
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:51:35 -0000

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 03:28:13AM +0000, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) wrote:
> Hi Acee,
> 
> What I meant is that BFD always augments the control palne protocols in ietf-routing model. And the BFD augmentation can be used as-is or mounted in LNE or in NI.

Basically:
Whereever ietf-routing is, BFD may also be.

BFD may not be everywhere that ietf-routing is (e.g. it may or may not be in
an instance, depending on device capabilities).

-- Jeff