Re: [yang-doctors] RFC 9127-bis question - impact of reference clauses in an import statement
Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Tue, 14 December 2021 16:24 UTC
Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFDC3A0E30;
Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:24:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id UPoT2o9UVJlB; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:24:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC383A0E2F;
Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:24:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 44EC51E2FA; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:24:14 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:24:13 -0500
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Martin =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rklund?= <mbj+ietf@4668.se>
Cc: yang-doctors@ietf.org, ietfa@btconnect.com,
draft-ietf-bfd-rfc9127-bis@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20211214162413.GB15763@pfrc.org>
References: <20211209221207.GC22655@pfrc.org> <20211214153803.GA15763@pfrc.org>
<20211214.172042.1997763003674645526.id@4668.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20211214.172042.1997763003674645526.id@4668.se>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/MN9h5UoCL556_3KGFgSM3CKRkc4>
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] RFC 9127-bis question - impact of reference
clauses in an import statement
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>,
<mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>,
<mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:24:18 -0000
Martin, On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 05:20:42PM +0100, Martin Björklund wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 05:12:07PM -0500, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > Would it be possible to avoid the problem by not doing a full > 9127bis, but just publish an RFC with a new version of ietf-bfd-types? Tom seemed to think that was not acceptable. If this is the acceptable way to handle this, it's likely preferable. -- Jeff
- [yang-doctors] RFC 9127-bis question - impact of … Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [yang-doctors] RFC 9127-bis question - impact… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [yang-doctors] RFC 9127-bis question - impact… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [yang-doctors] RFC 9127-bis question - impact… Martin Björklund
- Re: [yang-doctors] RFC 9127-bis question - impact… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [yang-doctors] RFC 9127-bis question - impact… t petch
- Re: [yang-doctors] RFC 9127-bis question - impact… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [yang-doctors] RFC 9127-bis question - impact… t petch
- Re: [yang-doctors] RFC 9127-bis question - impact… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [yang-doctors] RFC 9127-bis question - impact… Martin Björklund
- Re: [yang-doctors] RFC 9127-bis question - impact… Reshad Rahman
- [yang-doctors] RFC 9127-bis question - impact of … t petch
- Re: [yang-doctors] RFC 9127-bis question - impact… Reshad Rahman
- Re: [yang-doctors] RFC 9127-bis question - impact… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [yang-doctors] RFC 9127-bis question - impact… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [yang-doctors] RFC 9127-bis question - impact… Acee Lindem (acee)