IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yang-doctors] [Rfced-future] Last Call Reviews of documents associated with the change in the RFC Editor model

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Mon, 14 February 2022 17:19 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE273A0491; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:19:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.603
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.603 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40xqLwiSlxIu; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:19:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [185.32.222.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7984C3A041C; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:19:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:420:c0c0:1011::6] ([IPv6:2001:420:c0c0:1011:0:0:0:6]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-18) with ESMTPSA id 21EHIrXM114707 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 18:18:54 +0100
Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1644859136; bh=G0pyQMymPicpfjyBLUjEEGcB9MZY/9ILaGvP+DZKJuo=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=E0k7NZgCxEBus1i5n2H/32pyAQnLOAKiehxXQdx4frsmIua9Rqdl8P3CcdGAQzHKN +7YzGQ9qgvSUAFz9hk8DfVcMoLMebGau5BdolbuXI5t6QbIKbXOHdX8R+Hkfoamfdo 24yDcz6M++OFp/2MM9KyaZaxkYKvqQ5gHDPa1tsw=
Message-ID: <bd032a12-a78b-ab40-9464-25c98d68ace3@lear.ch>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 18:18:52 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>, Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>, rfced-future@iab.org
Cc: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, yang-doctors@ietf.org, "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, Mehmet <mersue@gmail.com>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
References: <CAFgnS4W5CL-CKccHQJ1RRPeNCCzKY-g0paECCw66T5AepWWmyg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
In-Reply-To: <CAFgnS4W5CL-CKccHQJ1RRPeNCCzKY-g0paECCw66T5AepWWmyg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------fwebME0Yf0LcGlLSN8mhXdNW"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/OokBMM6VKtuCg_FtMbbRKxKRhww>
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] [Rfced-future] Last Call Reviews of documents associated with the change in the RFC Editor model
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:19:17 -0000

Hi Dan,

Thanks for your review.  YANG and directorate reviews are part of IETF 
process.  This document does not address IETF process, but rather the 
evolution of the process that oversees the RFC series and RFC editor.

As such, IMHO discussing YANG reviews or directorate reviews is out of 
scope.

Regards,

Eliot


On 14.02.22 16:35, Dan Romascanu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I reviewed on behalf of the YANG Doctors team the four documents 
> submitted for comments associated with the change in the RFC Editor 
> model. My reading and review concerns only aspects related to 
> documents related to YANG, containing or refering to YANG models and 
> the review process of these documents.
>
> Here are my findings and comments:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-05
>
> Ready
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rsalz-2028bis-05
>
> Ready with Issues
>
> The document is ready from the perspective of the YANG Doctors, with 
> one comment. The document does not mention in any place the role of 
> the IETF Directorates and review teams such as the YANG Doctors in the 
> IETF documents review process. As the reviews of these teams are part 
> of the process I suggest considering adding text, possibly in Section 3.
>
> ttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-01 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-01>
>
> Ready
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11
>
> Ready
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email