Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietf.org
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from [10.244.8.143] (unknown [104.131.183.230])
	by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648D5C14F5EB;
	Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?J=C3=BCrgen_Sch=C3=B6nw=C3=A4lder_via_Datatracker?=
 <noreply@ietf.org>
To: <yang-doctors@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.26.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: 
 <173004750398.233139.6168831221518350449@dt-datatracker-6cdf944fd9-dld6h>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:45:03 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: N2EFKT6NLXXJ4T7HH4M7ES4GNVTGDH5M
X-Message-ID-Hash: N2EFKT6NLXXJ4T7HH4M7ES4GNVTGDH5M
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency;
 loop; banned-address; member-moderation;
 header-match-yang-doctors.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia;
 implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject;
 digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename.all@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: =?utf-8?b?SsO8cmdlbiBTY2jDtm53w6RsZGVy?=
 <jschoenwaelder@constructor.university>
Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5Byang-doctors=5D_Yangdoctors_early_review_of_draft-ietf-netmod-y?=
	=?utf-8?q?ang-module-filename-00?=
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate  <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
Archived-At: 
 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/RXvXt09xE2FZTVoZ6AvPedRqnuA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:yang-doctors-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:yang-doctors-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yang-doctors-leave@ietf.org>

Reviewer: Jürgen Schönwälder
Review result: Not Ready

This document does not contain any YANG definitions and hence it is
not clear what a YANG doctor review of this document should be.	That
said, I	believe	the document is	not ready since	it unnecessarily
modifies RFC 7950 rules. I will post more detailed comments as an
individual contributor to the NETMOD mailing list.


