IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yang-doctors] Timeline for BRSKI-AE Review

Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com> Mon, 09 August 2021 14:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mersue@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271BA3A144A; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 07:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rgoIxa_FCFdn; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 07:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7180F3A1446; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 07:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id i4so4216084wru.0; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 07:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=FIbmqyPOYeK72/0PgM0TUGFDsFtjt5YMKLlf2bFj3X8=; b=V0PEZg4eV4oriCut5um9DYDFKuFLATx/xM4z/eEY5VcZL/SpFms8J3vVy9VxniiSRz WAUF0hc2NmQu4ZrPPkcn+zw46WZhZncT3wRP9vyIbglffU0+cRjksvJXcu19HNQ24XlJ og80mhwtRQvoLbbFXADXM12T7SVk49PC+0Thl2eAd9MVygMDC9WxwP2KgTm73+M4DbLB cVwLw3OayRTS0wGxG0XBTU+MK9oF/lGXPUxlhRcxXqKMAZCgdduabICO71ogilE///wF dd+sofOanyeJFP5Q5FTryeROKlI/0/HUhjEcGFY+7NsM68VmnXBSoKPPqnDgcbek/aBL tXtg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=FIbmqyPOYeK72/0PgM0TUGFDsFtjt5YMKLlf2bFj3X8=; b=V+66Jjl2OvpEkecPdprEM6qmJq5yLGdUZR65PLL7AgII0WPoltZDpxTSL2UaeiQgCe jzRX1Y/KXG5u0/PKZ+nCJhgv6guIDeYwyPxeAWy5LgYnt9FMPC4wPTGG4Ew8KpE1Wh43 t3MjVX97Z690qG7rKYd0qai88KVyfarFfoAKfAZmldv3R/23u1u34QG+2CgF5YhpC4IT Gw05hN8srfcQytauOR4CrV6dbixa10NxFp1Qq3wRmvWIFuTmCQnBIQL47gXAlx9ED8rs zb5PpxFr0fHfG6xA4DPd7QRco2K94Ff/5ytAV3+BL5VZ2oUghhg6pbLCJG31ekRtMBPI czAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532y1nf8lbaGw+i/h/v7na6DJa1FabN2jDQpF/05fVXdzR/BBpH4 DW+VaXR6cNfV1UKTKYrlrU9SgM/Ba5M=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWb3LST9E0lDjapVjL2ApRsDaSqnS7YRFT6zI75SQ9T/d0dlQ8+IyN8oKUPtmFNge3u86ucw==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:e6c4:: with SMTP id y4mr25275999wrm.220.1628518522495; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 07:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOPFLHJVQJ ([188.119.61.92]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u5sm2741598wrr.94.2021.08.09.07.15.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Aug 2021 07:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Mehmet Ersue" <mersue@gmail.com>
To: "'Fries, Steffen'" <steffen.fries@siemens.com>, "'Rahman'" <reshad@yahoo.com>
Cc: "'Eliot Lear'" <lear@cisco.com>, "'Brockhaus, Hendrik'" <hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com>, "'Michael Richardson'" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, <tte@cs.fau.de>, "'Werner, Thomas'" <thomas-werner@siemens.com>, <anima@ietf.org>, <yang-doctors@ietf.org>
References: <1b42377c8d7a48ea9a84dd7e7bff0421@siemens.com>
In-Reply-To: <1b42377c8d7a48ea9a84dd7e7bff0421@siemens.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 16:15:20 +0200
Message-ID: <00ad01d78d28$fd7c77c0$f8756740$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00AE_01D78D39.C107B8C0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQMKQVXV6leu7dGNu9qWiNKWxUw8zakFzlMg
Content-Language: de
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/YCoAUDBwc9n3EOjtKpBMXlX4AS4>
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] Timeline for BRSKI-AE Review
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 14:15:30 -0000

Hi Steffen,

 

AFAIK Reshad is back from vacation and will do the review in the next days.

Thank you for your patience.

 

Cheers,

Mehmet

 

From: yang-doctors <yang-doctors-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Fries,
Steffen
Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 8:07 AM
To: yang-doctors@ietf.org
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>om>; Brockhaus, Hendrik
<hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com>om>; Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>ca>;
tte@cs.fau.de; Werner, Thomas <thomas-werner@siemens.com>om>; anima@ietf.org
Subject: [yang-doctors] Timeline for BRSKI-AE Review

 

Dear Yang Doctors,

 

I just wanted to ask if there is any timeline information available for the
review of BRSKI-AE. We have at least two YANG questions connected to the
draft, on relates to the ongoing discussion regarding RFC8366bis to allow
further assertions to be added. This  relates to issue #18
(https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-async-enroll/issues/18) in the
issue tracker of BRSKI-AE. 

Besides this, there is a YANG module included in section 6 to enhance the
voucher-request with additional data to allow a registrar and MASA to verify
if an authorized registrar-agent was involved in the bootstrapping for which
an early review would be requested.

 

Best regards

Steffen

 

--
Steffen Fries
Siemens AG

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email