IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yang-doctors] Timeline for BRSKI-AE Review

Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com> Wed, 11 August 2021 10:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mersue@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6693A0E89; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 03:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zbiklvmNI2e6; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 03:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 473AA3A0E87; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 03:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id k4so1550360wms.3; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 03:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=8rRkBvSOva+a51CXRu5SMyKXny98tew1m9kx4E3OmZ0=; b=rtbOsid4Y69a15+KEBzEcNnhmD2nyv2bvdaFvh0s1eWBQjjPWXgBUfaVc0NhzO34Q5 ipugZTw6ndBI+IH5IEu+8wKESZm5dZGWojhIhsrnz6R6Xk5m3tATDpvdDkdIWfR3+g8l RU4h9Bjy+7PagJdtnpqkUBxtPa3awLg89eW/OGLblvnx2Ip0BM91SQ87QZxpspL6/Xiu 0tJU242D5bgxkytPi+T1dbYIrr3IPKD/00dolZ7lL5BSlfXgC3FbUqO1+Pm5q0GaefkU Ei/CfCqU8iOWKSwSpPqciTyJMA9xakKCYIJ2iBV5hW6aBuE29sGFGSNnA5SNXPgh/rg8 uLBQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=8rRkBvSOva+a51CXRu5SMyKXny98tew1m9kx4E3OmZ0=; b=AX7szqSEArHdNGTrYx2JHq0yDoE8zkVfhJ5eg/aZKdSwuu9wVLNklaprBXp/7e1nts fEIpM//PAukXphbO1+As/t5N4xxreHwYEfIfTZrFztgLcSahsdoEMDZGeBDJZ3Rdq2Yb D9djrxmEXW80NDj/tPeMRyp5R5seddPucmbzjFfAH9dXzSenPDpxOCkrKiwysICx9281 QmNk0VSohWaCtI9J4a1I/eAfa/cVO+NHpRcfyDVymWd/Gki0opVii5T8pPFRwaZU7+C4 1Czd3H+XJdZMpxYr/iR48c+cDC2DDYmV9T2nWtIjwFOq8Cl71W8vgn4/QZxgVgwdrLS6 5tEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531eeRthzmF/FLQ9Puh1i0AfA3F6ijWNnkQDMGoTbokPQ2R7n8Bi hYRkuzjgOzseL+/ItrUGSE0KrgS2QHc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx8dxDtlY1+Nqyb0u/3YyfTg2o0xUGZ+e4Tq9wR/IevSPXo7roR9gkXu4mxwnrLRfkoOP/j1w==
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c041:: with SMTP id u1mr26265506wmc.95.1628677258911; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 03:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOPFLHJVQJ ([188.119.61.92]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k10sm256014wrq.42.2021.08.11.03.20.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 03:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Mehmet Ersue" <mersue@gmail.com>
To: "'Reshad Rahman'" <reshad@yahoo.com>, "'Fries, Steffen'" <steffen.fries@siemens.com>
Cc: "'Eliot Lear'" <lear@cisco.com>, "'Brockhaus, Hendrik'" <hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com>, "'Michael Richardson'" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, <tte@cs.fau.de>, "'Werner, Thomas'" <thomas-werner@siemens.com>, <anima@ietf.org>, <yang-doctors@ietf.org>
References: <1b42377c8d7a48ea9a84dd7e7bff0421@siemens.com> <00ad01d78d28$fd7c77c0$f8756740$@gmail.com> <1786597158.535956.1628563514138@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1786597158.535956.1628563514138@mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:20:56 +0200
Message-ID: <05a401d78e9a$93bdb470$bb391d50$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_05A5_01D78EAB.57468470"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQMKQVXV6leu7dGNu9qWiNKWxUw8zQHMvoLQAjvA3rSo6G3KwA==
Content-Language: de
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/YMTxF1Q9yQGek0nLL6LVLkDwsvM>
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] Timeline for BRSKI-AE Review
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 10:21:09 -0000

Hi Reshad,

 

I assume end of this week is fine.

I believe a new reviewer wouldn’t bring any advantage at this stage.

 

Thanks,

Mehmet

 

From: Reshad Rahman <reshad@yahoo.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 4:45 AM
To: 'Fries, Steffen' <steffen.fries@siemens.com>om>; Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com>
Cc: 'Eliot Lear' <lear@cisco.com>om>; 'Brockhaus, Hendrik' <hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com>om>; 'Michael Richardson' <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>ca>; tte@cs.fau.de; 'Werner, Thomas' <thomas-werner@siemens.com>om>; anima@ietf.org; yang-doctors@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] Timeline for BRSKI-AE Review

 

All, apologies for the delay. Striving to have it done by the end of this week. If I can't have it done soon and since the review seems to be urgently needed, should we consider assigning another YD?

 

Regards,

Reshad.

 

On Monday, August 9, 2021, 10:15:24 AM EDT, Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com <mailto:mersue@gmail.com> > wrote: 

 

 

Hi Steffen,

 

AFAIK Reshad is back from vacation and will do the review in the next days.

Thank you for your patience.

 

Cheers,

Mehmet

 

From: yang-doctors <yang-doctors-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:yang-doctors-bounces@ietf.org> > On Behalf Of Fries, Steffen
Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 8:07 AM
To: yang-doctors@ietf.org <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org> 
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com <mailto:lear@cisco.com> >; Brockhaus, Hendrik <hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com <mailto:hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com> >; Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca <mailto:mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> >; tte@cs.fau.de <mailto:tte@cs.fau.de> ; Werner, Thomas <thomas-werner@siemens.com <mailto:thomas-werner@siemens.com> >; anima@ietf.org <mailto:anima@ietf.org> 
Subject: [yang-doctors] Timeline for BRSKI-AE Review

 

Dear Yang Doctors,

 

I just wanted to ask if there is any timeline information available for the review of BRSKI-AE. We have at least two YANG questions connected to the draft, on relates to the ongoing discussion regarding RFC8366bis to allow further assertions to be added. This  relates to issue #18  (https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-async-enroll/issues/18) in the issue tracker of BRSKI-AE. 

Besides this, there is a YANG module included in section 6 to enhance the voucher-request with additional data to allow a registrar and MASA to verify if an authorized registrar-agent was involved in the bootstrapping for which an early review would be requested.

 

Best regards

Steffen

 

--
Steffen Fries
Siemens AG

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email