[yang-doctors] Deprecated Nodes

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 08 August 2019 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A06012015C for <yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 07:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=SkPm/cgp; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=tgKHZzr4
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zdinBoN_rajE for <yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 07:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA328120145 for <yang-doctors@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 07:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3375; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1565275446; x=1566485046; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=crAMbCG+8DNjlBm4A1fJpKQt1XbTioXodfZlFOQtEQ4=; b=SkPm/cgp4BfWJ7nXMHp85CHDf1Tvat+5F8IrOpN5C2vPzfvNC5dWrpK/ w8XgRbkEY8R3PROgZs+r0NefkxuYpoFHyavzpCq5sTciBmdBAd3ibQBeO 06brQ5V2p5Q6qjk8i9DNbmyj/Rs2LZ5wDGcWxhLIli+nTD9CBZLzPNNx3 I=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:XWqHDxYgKeA+GK7SzzhZAo7/LSx94ef9IxIV55w7irlHbqWk+dH4MVfC4el20QKbRp3VvvRDjeee87vtX2AN+96giDgDa9QNHwQAld1QmgUhBMCfDkiuJfXnYgQxHd9JUxlu+HToeUU=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AKAQDnNExd/5FdJa1mHQEBBQEHBQGBVQYBCwGBFS9QA21VIAQLKoQeg0cDizRMlRWEWoEugSQDVAkBAQEMAQEtAgEBhFiCPyM2Bw4BBAEBBAEBBAEKbYUnDIVjER0BATgRAQw+AgQwJwQ1gwABgR1NAx0BAqByAoE4iGBxgTKCegEBBYJIgk0YghQJgTQBi2MXgX+BOB+KWTKCJo8PhQiWOm0JAoIdlCkbmDaGDp87AgQCBAUCDgEBBYFWATGBWHAVZQGCQYJCg3GKU3KBKYtwAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,361,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="306397711"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 08 Aug 2019 14:44:05 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com (xch-aln-010.cisco.com [173.36.7.20]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x78Ei5No000580 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <yang-doctors@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 14:44:05 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com (173.36.7.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:44:04 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:44:04 -0500
Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 10:44:04 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=LBzxMy8vXrIrbUvCUQ0cCWRF+b39JHerh66gpYk9JOVw3chpqNqb3aGnrw6XLpEBR+264GcJTgQG+DG4+clxfJ9Nd42122N+99b3LPDQ9l+LTGvUhOOH8p0X/9oQUU+RjBNENPqDNjBrth4nFoK9CBC+JU8S0quybgDQcus8gz01xxPtMTNSOwZ0mwvB9xqcGIuJYWDAeAW71S5LHn6puPVYaoZkkXMs+/2IdRbCiWIX1y9NXvJ50AdO7L/I57SU141MJy7iButdOadAFX8q0zRgNoKN07Lrf0e5Maw7e39AHKrl3xewvCNyJ2bCCHfvRqifz7jwrRxnXKP3fOE5vQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=crAMbCG+8DNjlBm4A1fJpKQt1XbTioXodfZlFOQtEQ4=; b=Q1x207tJhK8Zbh4iOLq/uN4u72iidGvMdnJJjREBjql0iwjAntKg6nSR8cy0X2GhpLEL9L3iAnFL9FICe6DHz1xxWuCEaoU51SYW+E5g6xWmIm1/FLRkiPnSAbcP3d/RTM4I8UhR0/9TK0DZCc49ms++krzb/XwRfepPPv7P6Pr7ukslEHyllAOsFbSbAzxo++vi3IjPhzmnXHCL8UyJ4MMrh3WYldISOssRuJrZVzk+pGdi5cA0iwy4v2qgsyWic5nnpJqUw3mNVF1y2F9mNdQ22n+1qM0aVe+mt6hJi79gv/Gm6linw77sTx+tFbcBoNuIYlKW+Gzd5aMnE0DEKA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1;spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com;dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com;arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=crAMbCG+8DNjlBm4A1fJpKQt1XbTioXodfZlFOQtEQ4=; b=tgKHZzr41Bok75J8tGDL4CNWE2ul2mMVqpGpTxwq00bXwoQdKKsx6ksU5xWDSALpa92h6A7IxijMxzwEMGs+SC955BgLJzAnH8UOwPKG2zRwpr+5AVha7yWnByMU3Yf9TrKq88uWffd9/wBdkIW+1csGTjpQoD2qDpFOsIJ9NrY=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.14) by MN2PR11MB4191.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.179.151.224) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2136.16; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 14:44:03 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::859c:f271:3be2:74e0]) by MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::859c:f271:3be2:74e0%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2157.015; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 14:44:03 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Deprecated Nodes
Thread-Index: AQHVTfe4sJ3OWCjw00+SMRLKl19jZA==
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 14:44:02 +0000
Message-ID: <249E26B5-9C2B-49C1-AC13-0EDEB52043CB@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1001::2f]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 90ecc4da-437d-4cf5-e579-08d71c0edb4c
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB4191;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4191:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB419182B57C2D15C6AD4D3D7FC2D70@MN2PR11MB4191.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 012349AD1C
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(366004)(396003)(376002)(136003)(39860400002)(346002)(189003)(199004)(186003)(66476007)(25786009)(5660300002)(256004)(33656002)(53936002)(7736002)(7116003)(316002)(99286004)(486006)(71200400001)(71190400001)(81156014)(6512007)(66556008)(66946007)(64756008)(6486002)(81166006)(54896002)(6306002)(8936002)(76116006)(6436002)(66446008)(86362001)(2616005)(46003)(102836004)(476003)(6506007)(8676002)(3480700005)(558084003)(6116002)(14454004)(2906002)(6916009)(36756003)(4743002)(478600001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4191; H:MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: S9SU3iuveHWEcYwIhDe1Ohf6dVm+0eaOh1ifIIeDBkAcc1DJjuOmegvXyTY6qPUTQdd0eB7MfdjpUt2sjJ2xJbOnEYdG32JuALItGGpyLCs4JdUovhW+YcIweT8bc2Vvn6bU+xGpLHIQcLljj/8qpmEZw84U00A91qKs2xsZKVUouUd72MjROr6+hQ22mbNPHtu+XQksM7rn4pUZh8DO+6GFdDUxKLeon0gIohVisQKZjvNAZjA/TECgsmVXQYgBM5rjyl7CCoBoNgiOGDax383tYEZebtJYwExzwSscMy+DJAbqtsy2X+2yTgc1/aFOv23PGnQTHsh3rKhuZMSkdbMLTJKA/Xfl9dQsdzqjBstQ7TdKI8JrIL28yryX02btimCSDRMQ1DbLwEy71toHOYblhbVxlHEPBcce7gZAhxg=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_249E26B59C2B49C1AC130EDEB52043CBciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 90ecc4da-437d-4cf5-e579-08d71c0edb4c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Aug 2019 14:44:02.9344 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: n25wNfzn0P9nNW4YNkRD8g4jGMXM409a/hzXEAg1a9nN1vol/LyZLLxAuHaqNe/B
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4191
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.20, xch-aln-010.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/gWyEfmigAQReGb3rFRWSOThpEpg>
Subject: [yang-doctors] Deprecated Nodes
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 14:44:08 -0000

When a client retrieves configuration for a device, should the deprecated nodes be included in the response? For example, using NETCONF get-config? I have my own interpretation of the answer but don’t want to bias the response from others.

Thanks,
Acee