Re: [yang-doctors] [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server-24

Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net> Thu, 27 May 2021 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <01000179af378d51-c0a96433-9313-4b0d-bf3f-0a8f54be4852-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 850E03A07B3; Thu, 27 May 2021 12:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JTXOOAeiMmjE; Thu, 27 May 2021 12:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a48-92.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-92.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC1883A07A8; Thu, 27 May 2021 12:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug; d=amazonses.com; t=1622142324; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:Feedback-ID; bh=1ODFTHR9NW2iDEgAWx/Zorq4dJtPYzCmEYosaJ6N38Y=; b=NrYsEFXwKHLsGBU0aPNND3YjLxZ4/lsKCKaQKqQG9+2kzW5Xm+O0TYq2F5YeNoRy ojCiEPM99TPXOcZ0Ckc0Aozjmpoqx66tHzfwEAfFUPKa8PmDlfKHE1lCobgx3/28zGj Tx9aLtflx3xAy2AxTulFc4xqaKcRTVcFma5aTIlQ=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>
In-Reply-To: <162197056513.1767.16350161534776831688@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 19:05:24 +0000
Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <01000179af378d51-c0a96433-9313-4b0d-bf3f-0a8f54be4852-000000@email.amazonses.com>
References: <162197056513.1767.16350161534776831688@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2021.05.27-54.240.48.92
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/jmrRSltc9e2s_PPRjhI1RFzhoSc>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 29 May 2021 03:03:50 -0700
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server-24
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 19:05:37 -0000

[moving all alias except “netconf” to the BCC list]


Hi Andy,

Thank you for your review!


> On May 25, 2021, at 3:22 PM, Andy Bierman via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Andy Bierman
> Review result: Ready
> 
> Comments:
> 
> I am not commenting on the TLS 1.0 and 1.3 onging discussions.
> The WG decision does not impact the YANG module review.
> 
> 1) Measuring Interoperability for groupings and identities
> 
> [same comment for SSH and TLS drafts]
> 
> These modules are intentionally abstract.
> There are no protocol-accessible objects defined at all.
> Interoperability is usually measured in the context of a
> specific protocol (e.g., NETCONF).
> 
> There is an assumption that interoperability will be achieved
> by some other RFCs that will have "uses" statements to create
> protocol-accessible or otherwise implementable objects.
> 
> There is also an assumption that the groupings will be used the
> same everywhere, and the only difference will be the
> path from root to the objects in these groupings.
> In fact, the "refine" statement allows each usage to be
> different.
> 
> Perhaps the drafts should mention these interoperability issues.

Let’s discuss this in my response to the same comment in your review of the ssh-client-server draft.


> 2)  mandatory choice of only optional-to-implement cases
> 
> The choice /ietf-tls-client:client-identity/auth-type
> is mandatory but all cases have if-feature-stmts.
> Does draft mention 1 of the 4 features MUST be implemented?



The same construct is present in the ietf-tls-server module as well...I’ll apply the agreed upon solution to both.  Would the following update suffice?

OLD:

      choice auth-type {
        mandatory true;
        description
          "A choice amongst authentication types.”;

NEW:

      choice auth-type {
        mandatory true;
        description
          "A choice amongst authentication types, of which one must
           be enabled (via its associated 'feature') and selected.”;



K.