Re: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-lisp-yang-11

"Alberto Rodriguez Natal (natal)" <natal@cisco.com> Wed, 21 August 2019 03:44 UTC

Return-Path: <natal@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942CA120106; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=L3MSQJ3x; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=LxzLfUIG
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VyU-LeWAO4-a; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A584B12007A; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1794; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1566359041; x=1567568641; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=1FSDGxkcPhtfc4bulqEJCJT9VfDpioZWh/zmW7xz7Ro=; b=L3MSQJ3xFFzzR9aJg16riMdgeZ3xH/AFnq1ITn1Px7tdveYPUe6xjgro hzgZ3k6cWVRmyR4D5Nh7hQr9fBTSJ1D6xjDH8OKQvKoTXrmqrc3TliuZW OGYeyewA7no9sOyIlOqCuCv2gn/LKJ7wY/5CAggUhBCH7q/psjP2kNsg6 s=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3ADFXZ5RYDvPoE/0KTSRGl3Gf/LSx94ef9IxIV55?= =?us-ascii?q?w7irlHbqWk+dH4MVfC4el20Q+bRp3VvvRDjeee87vtX2AN+96giDgDa9QNMn?= =?us-ascii?q?1NksAKh0olCc+BB1f8KavsZjAzGOxJVURu+DewNk0GUMs=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AXAADZvFxd/4oNJK1mGwEBAQEDAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BBwMBAQGBUwYBAQELAYFEUAOBQiAECyqEH4NHA4RShiuCNyWXZYEugSQDVAk?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEMAQEtAgEBhD8CF4I+IzQJDgIFAQEEAQEBAgEGBG2FJwyFSgEBAQMBEhE?= =?us-ascii?q?RDAEBNwEPAgEIDgoCAhkNAgICMBUQAgQOBSKDAIFrAw4PAQKgIgKBOIhhc4E?= =?us-ascii?q?ygnsBAQWFFxiCFAmBDCgBi2gYgX+BOAwTgkw+hB0ngwsyggQijxecQgkCgh2?= =?us-ascii?q?UORuYRqVpAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFQOIFYcBVlAYJBgkKDcopTcoEpi06CUgEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,410,1559520000"; d="scan'208";a="310920425"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 21 Aug 2019 03:43:59 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7L3hx1o013218 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 03:43:59 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 22:43:59 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 22:43:58 -0500
Received: from NAM05-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 23:43:58 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=kY1f7Iyvca8gwivWtA1jsu1co20apjcDrD+tJrjtuFMCGbanPY+OBGwITzV8H9hC/yLNziKwzYyXosgxRFmk31XhkD1bmdwzXvQwbXqce5+6hzAlfLYoIhVy4KcRALeJvzItFIvUx4HPET83raNoV0z5niWEZEHBV1XXK7yeJ1iEEYmJ+HzvLYlvsLFZUcYqNWBnmlEoXjKKhR/NMyj237O7W1u2ENAziEUYRQntcWQMKG2dQ1CRXnVrLFl7ec2xQM0kYScKS/H1GskaqvQ4drT+MN2UNHr0A70zpUlKWCwtLyWkJfBiqndx0QRw82636mBNN9WkBvItjcseaWGhJg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=1FSDGxkcPhtfc4bulqEJCJT9VfDpioZWh/zmW7xz7Ro=; b=Kap93UwX0nzFLZryINJzSdrr35at8FKGjDcd64eCB5UBY/R/hzRhCvEGJoSfhYORO3CPqd0KgkDPZ2NEQubUjSqY6jtRdCB9OEA24UyLw5xXb3IBA3VLljXn2c2ZYRrKX5/z6sr7xeMoPcjhMrk/uXoNGWynvXEBSQYsNP8przaKE3Z/VybZ0eCYBj8K5vIKsVIXIeFSvaEpV+fLmduADgEeKpUu3P6YmqgptPIMczHIXaBbPI7Km6Upspr1xyfcC0OV5u/gNeovPc++rd/D2EG8Ke3Kau0NwnZc6jtDdUkJccLyHBSlYmWFjJHJXD4MItYnnkwUsZXKVxE1lZIQMg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=1FSDGxkcPhtfc4bulqEJCJT9VfDpioZWh/zmW7xz7Ro=; b=LxzLfUIGMghsqzGeYCaXNde8WaFlLlxkNuidsJ4nAtIObcgcaiILyXtaxq93cYm1LtsYr6oSUCr+W5FtTP/7QFBq4TkhxfBSmsAHRH8JIVPyh+x1o+29ge1gi2hrLIWlpbRvASbgrfSnUgux35aPOJAYxOvoxQyH9jD2kFLG1yc=
Received: from BYAPR11MB3014.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.177.225.13) by BYAPR11MB3191.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.177.127.88) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2178.18; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 03:43:57 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB3014.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::59ae:773d:d7b0:9ca]) by BYAPR11MB3014.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::59ae:773d:d7b0:9ca%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2178.018; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 03:43:56 +0000
From: "Alberto Rodriguez Natal (natal)" <natal@cisco.com>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
CC: "yang-doctors@ietf.org" <yang-doctors@ietf.org>, "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lisp-yang.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lisp-yang.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-lisp-yang-11
Thread-Index: AQHVQ1Nu85KNK2Kykkek9GiFQm7DE6cEDo0AgACjV4D///dtAA==
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 03:43:56 +0000
Message-ID: <58A3BD0A-F0AE-43E8-8846-2E890D60F1F3@cisco.com>
References: <156410535896.17429.16464147399003551309@ietfa.amsl.com> <69983428-3A0C-4DAB-857E-75586DCE27D0@cisco.com> <624A552C-CF02-4716-A7C1-2A12DD6826C6@chopps.org>
In-Reply-To: <624A552C-CF02-4716-A7C1-2A12DD6826C6@chopps.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1b.0.190715
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=natal@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c8:1005::564]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3f2baac4-93e0-457b-9153-08d725e9cb9e
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR11MB3191;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB3191:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB31919C17EF4F56616A8A74D5B6AA0@BYAPR11MB3191.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0136C1DDA4
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(136003)(376002)(366004)(396003)(346002)(199004)(189003)(25786009)(8936002)(8676002)(6436002)(33656002)(446003)(66556008)(36756003)(76116006)(86362001)(66446008)(81156014)(256004)(81166006)(2616005)(66476007)(71190400001)(71200400001)(66946007)(6116002)(64756008)(478600001)(2906002)(14454004)(11346002)(486006)(5660300002)(6506007)(53546011)(476003)(186003)(305945005)(46003)(102836004)(7736002)(229853002)(54906003)(53936002)(76176011)(6486002)(4326008)(316002)(6512007)(6246003)(99286004)(6916009)(58126008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR11MB3191; H:BYAPR11MB3014.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: a142v4UlnuFI7BcKOOV0crV3AOdC9bBJt6XQuu0o9nUOQfg6wCvZJeS10rLRGaEhH6HoqE9jgKgTEZzHyyvpXyF0tmyvhynxGnFPY6AgNQzugX6uMmaSxwKjXxdPG+Do08fFpu7oevIRt96SkxQy9PJeOqHb/cnLQKG8tmONjjc65NI0xTMZb2s4KmJkzDXvnHYbCMd+BucNNjAbuW0x8WOGfJwiDCOGsmBztFtJJBkDAriCAZ4kzd4xrGoHtwCuylLcgiHdtMZJeI9GOKGSu9ga/fNvT04+w+nU/cZZRELN7ivHkoR/0/M7zPlwrDNz/5RssrWEACoAulLa+63SuTlrI6W/PXHrh3YnSFBscH8m49fxYN0dOCi7CwQ73flG+sw+pTmB8UKCoCyccnkFedJh0hpI7qvWud6Q2U/U1xQ=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <C7A1481715FF48479CF78661D6CE595A@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3f2baac4-93e0-457b-9153-08d725e9cb9e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Aug 2019 03:43:56.7538 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: AmVHjjCMh1YZuOQrkBYNqc9R3Q2EDaSsxJQ9W6dT40CyiM7zxZn50e70d71ZsZQ0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB3191
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.15, xch-aln-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/jtqZhLxG68d7KuHBXK86L8YM9AQ>
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-lisp-yang-11
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 03:44:04 -0000

Thanks Chris, that makes sense. We'll leave it as minutes then. 

Best,
Alberto

´╗┐On 8/20/19, 2:14 PM, "Christian Hopps" <chopps@chopps.org>; wrote:

    
    
    > On Aug 20, 2019, at 2:30 PM, Alberto Rodriguez Natal (natal) <natal@cisco.com>; wrote:
    > 
    >       - TTL is limited to minute units. This may be overly restrictive. Couldn't
    >         there be some use (perhaps not common) e.g., perhaps when debugging, or in
    >         future versions of the protocol where seconds granularity might be useful?
    >         Changing these nodes later is non-backwards compatible and thus very
    >         painful to do.
    > 
    > [AR] That's a fair comment. We used minutes in the model, however, since RFC6833bis defines the TTLs in minutes. Do you think it would be reasonable to leave the TTL in minutes and aligned with 6833bis?
    
    If it were me I'd probably use seconds and mention in the description that the RFC granularity is minutes; however, since you don't define a range (a good thing) one backward compatible way to be able to specify sub-minute values in the future would be to augment in a seconds (or sub-seconds) node and have the minutes value be 0, so I think you're OK if you want to leave it as minutes.
    
    Thanks,
    Chris.