Re: [yang-doctors] [I2nsf] [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06
"Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com> Thu, 06 May 2021 02:44 UTC
Return-Path: <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB48C3A2C5A; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.465
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HK_NAME_FM_MR_MRS=0.631, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rqwZIrWUA6gp; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com (mail-lj1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DC7D3A2C58; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id w15so5103611ljo.10; Wed, 05 May 2021 19:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YAg6UazbkF049GSAgnz++ECln2yDVQGi0EAyFCgLBvo=; b=B8D3ruXRIT5XcPfDpUYzUgrammkLohdQHZQx5Tna8sol3FvipgFYA8C7XVJZC87TfR W5cW6pa7zPWGanAJz7dRvBBeoSgr8KD3mgs3cxk+09Zh46ePyD89dH3O8ff4S65y4flO rIk2D57IUUTS3K0fSRRQYEh7xzW+FKsTlZoEyER8HAUOKgdtlq1Hk1nwcNKFifLfmMGp bfL9ClOnHUO6gCofWtq8ac3ka8ZWdFxPKnLlxPn4EvjXOFD9O7fhKQbrptKm1t070Lb3 GCEKR7KRoaYnIeWRrNZYrd+SV8dRT6DhsBVYc2qNbZaDjAZ09aQkKxfqaY38t/UfLHzc UHZA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YAg6UazbkF049GSAgnz++ECln2yDVQGi0EAyFCgLBvo=; b=QvIN4S5agwbhWB34miIABexHPYCCnOfMUhMPZPKBlGyBhmQxtEg28sYL4x06zOChKE IX9dKDyTd4BX+xRoJUU9sMnudW69lAdW/j3aLMo0str2zOi51+f0afDBXBFyJsVt4Bkj B9JRQbElBslsse5wWqijck5QfEa1PTnfymxCiL02XPKM78qUN4tnSi0kQ3qaeMzATjPH wfPdl7Os7pa+M8OlLUWvwZ2ViPkfwcurRuSCxQ2CV1lD4Wt0Vs8jEn9E55BlpDLjs9Nt /2oP0RxmR4zIin6i/OZxK3Gwpcyw8NNmFfeX7R7motR/ruOq6HumRKpYZ1MeLMurrHd1 soVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532oQhmQSSLF22+0YYCLQUHTrAykncHrYLPxGzm6gCx25F3W9pbI 2WXtZjxsIbJ/Oqnte+MHiYIBLkLjCoMa9qK/+8A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwvMUzAdjjjpJhggloSa5BAGqgwH/p19ZyPkeADWlhMdQ02fhkF21eoXY83beTnNAjN8q0rK2aaO9HNDTheBPA=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9ad9:: with SMTP id p25mr1396089ljj.127.1620269089260; Wed, 05 May 2021 19:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <609276FB.1060508@btconnect.com>
In-Reply-To: <609276FB.1060508@btconnect.com>
From: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 11:44:14 +0900
Message-ID: <CAPK2DezW5iwB2THXkpiaJoMHMriZ2f5VqV2sOCVLbBt3mxn5Cg@mail.gmail.com>
To: t petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
Cc: "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model.all@ietf.org, Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>, YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org>, Patrick Lingga <patricklink888@gmail.com>, skku-iotlab-members <skku-iotlab-members@googlegroups.com>, "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000081877005c1a04bbd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/qE5LdrhLewF4q0pwYS8gYdv0MCc>
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] [I2nsf] [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 02:44:57 -0000
Hi Tom, I will use your comments to synchronize all the five I2NSF YANG data model drafts. Thanks. Best Regards, Paul On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 7:44 PM t petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> wrote: > Paul > > Top posting since this is a more general response (and leaving in YANG > doctors since I note that five different YANG doctors reviewed the five > I-D and so might not see the issue that concerns me). > > As you have probably realised, I have now looked at the five YANG I-D of > I2NSF and am concerned at the disparate approaches to the same topics > that I think will confuse a user and, likely, induce mistakes. I > provided some detailed comments in response to WG LC on > capability-data-model but really it cuts across all five. It may be > that the inconsistenicies that I see can be justified but if so, then I > think that the I-D may need some text to say so, to relate one I-D to > another. > > The treatment of YANG identity for ICMP is to me a clear example. I > think that nsf-monitoring is good here, deriving icmpv4 and icmpv6 from > icmp (and ipv4 and ipv6) > while capability is not good having icmp (sic) and icmpv6 as two > unrelated identity, no common base. > > But at a higher level it may be that capability has a better treatment > where it has > base event; [from which is derived] > identity system-event-capability { > identity system-alarm-capability { > > base system-event-capability; > identity access-violation { > identity configuration-change { > > base system-alarm-capability; > identity memory-alarm { > identity cpu-alarm { > identity disk-alarm { > identity hardware-alarm { > identity interface-alarm { > > while nsf-monitoring has > > base alarm-type; > identity mem-usage-alarm { > identity cpu-usage-alarm { > identity disk-usage-alarm { > identity hw-failure-alarm { > identity ifnet-state-alarm { > > base event-type; > identity access-denied { > identity config-change { > > Different structure, different terminology, and these examples are quite > close compared to some others. I would expect at least the root of the > identifier to be the same if not the whole identifier. > > What is missing, for me, is an underlying, high-level, information model > to provide a consistent structure and a consistent terminology for the > I2NSF YANG I-D. > > Tom Petch > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com> > To: <tom petch> > Cc: <Last Call>; <i2nsf@ietf.org>; <Andy Bierman>; <Yoav Nir>; > <draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model.all@ietf.org>; <Linda > Dunbar>; <Patrick Lingga>; <YANG Doctors>; <skku-iotlab-members>; <Mr. > Jaehoon Paul Jeong> > Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 3:49 PM > Subject: Re: [I2nsf] [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of > draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06 > > > > Hi Tom, > > Patrick and I have addressed all your comments below with the > following revision. > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-da > ta-model-08 > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-08> > > > > I attach our revision letter. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Best Regards, > > Paul > > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:59 PM tom petch > <daedulus@btconnect.com<mailto:daedulus@btconnect.com>> wrote: > > Paul > > > > Some admin comments on -07; I think that you need to: > > > > - change the title in YANG revision reference > > > > - add to the I-D references > > RFC959 > > RFC8632 > > > > - shorten lines. There is a limit to line length in RFC as per the > Style > > Guide. This is exceeded in the YANG where some of the path statements > > take it over 80 while some of the examples are over 100. > > > > - add a reference for the import of > > ietf-i2nsf-policy-rule-for-nsf > > > > HTH > > > > Tom Petcb > > > > On 01/04/2021 03:09, Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong wrote: > > > > Hi Andy, Linda, and Yoav, > > > > Patrick and I have addressed all the comments from Andy. > > > > Here is the revised draft -07: > > ATT00001.txt 130 bytes >
- [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of dr… Andy Bierman via Datatracker
- Re: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review o… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review o… Andy Bierman
- Re: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review o… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [yang-doctors] [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last c… tom petch
- Re: [yang-doctors] [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last c… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review o… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [yang-doctors] [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last c… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [yang-doctors] [I2nsf] [Last-Call] Yangdoctor… t petch
- Re: [yang-doctors] [I2nsf] [Last-Call] Yangdoctor… Martin Björklund
- Re: [yang-doctors] [I2nsf] [Last-Call] Yangdoctor… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [yang-doctors] [I2nsf] [Last-Call] Yangdoctor… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [yang-doctors] [I2nsf] [Last-Call] Yangdoctor… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [yang-doctors] [I2nsf] [Last-Call] Yangdoctor… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong