Re: [yang-doctors] [pim] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang-13.txt

[<[e-mail]>]

Hi Tom,






Thank you very much for your review!


Because the usage referenced to RFC4271 is an optional leaf. I am not sure if it can be in informatinve reference.


If the rule is mandatory, I will change it. :-)






Thanks,


Sandy


















原始邮件



发件人：tompetch <[e-mail]>
收件人：张征00007940;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
抄送人：[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
日 期 ：2020年02月26日 18:48
主 题 ：Re: [pim] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang-13.txt






On 25/02/2020 10:10, [e-mail] wrote:
> Hi Alvaro, Reshad, Tom, Xufeng,
>
> Thank you very much for your help!
>
> I updated the draft to version 15.
>
> Hope this version does well. Appreciate for your review! :-)


Looks good.

I would have made the reference to RFC4271 Normative but that is 
probably because I was so involved in its creation of that RFC so no big 
deal; I would not reissue it just for that - I am sure that the IESG 
will want plenty more:-)

I note that for all the addressees of this e-mail we seem to have lost 
Last Call; if that is the case than as and when this thread looks 
complete I would suggest forwarding a copy to Last Call so that that 
archive is complete.

Tom Petch















>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Sandy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 原始邮件
>
>
>
> 发件人：AlvaroRetana <[e-mail]>
> 收件人：Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;张征00007940;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
> 抄送人：[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
> 日 期 ：2020年02月22日 00:08
> 主 题 ：Re: [pim] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang-13.txt
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks Reshad!
>
>
>
>
> Sandy:  Looks like this is the last set of significant changes.  I’ll forward the document for IESG Evaluation as soon as the examples are added.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> Alvaro.
>
>
> On February 7, 2020 at 4:49:11 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) ([e-mail]) wrote:
>
>
> Thank you Sandy for addressing the last round of comments. I didn’t re-review the whole document, just made sure that comments were addressed. They have all been addressed for the exception of examples. There are still no examples, I believe you should have a config example, an operational example (with sa-cache) and action examples (clear-peer and clear-sa-cache) and all examples have to match.
>