Return-Path: X-Original-To: yang-sid-logistics@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yang-sid-logistics@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF004C151094; Wed, 4 Dec 2024 04:01:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.909 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aKrsFmKYHXRQ; Wed, 4 Dec 2024 04:01:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 210A2C151092; Wed, 4 Dec 2024 04:01:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpclient.apple (p5dc5d074.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.197.208.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Y3GMB3XgpzDCbf; Wed, 4 Dec 2024 13:01:10 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51.11.1\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 13:00:59 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <96629336-1428-4745-97DB-EBF2A9EE6171@tzi.org> References: <173081740880.50534.5317268382668428309@dt-datatracker-5f77bcf4bd-vglkb> <1390262650.15218404.1730822309376.JavaMail.zimbra@imt-atlantique.fr> To: Laurent Toutain X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51.11.1) Message-ID-Hash: 3L5H326BVA6BBU36JEVMYV22NDFEZ3ZH X-Message-ID-Hash: 3L5H326BVA6BBU36JEVMYV22NDFEZ3ZH X-MailFrom: cabo@tzi.org X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: Alexander PELOV , yang-sid-logistics@ietf.org, core , schc X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BYang-sid-logistics=5D_Re=3A_=5BSchc=5D_New_Version_Notification?= =?utf-8?q?_for_draft-pelov-sid-procedure-00=2Etxt?= List-Id: "Communication facilitating the logistics of handling YANG SIDs (RFC 9595) in IANA registration and RFC Production Center processes" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 4. Dec 2024, at 11:30, Laurent Toutain wrote: >=20 > the size could be of 500 SIDs. The current model needs 125 SIDs. Not sure a factor four slosh will be our normal range allocation. Do you expect this count of 125 SIDs to grow a lot? (Maybe contiguous allocations are more important in your case so the = normal =E2=80=9Cadd a range=E2=80=9D approach doesn=E2=80=99t work so = well.) (Note also that ranges larger than 250 will have larger deltas, if that = is important for your application.) Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten