Re: [YANG] errors

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 08:41:49AM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:
> 
> > What if the DM writer wants to raise an existing standard error?

That's what I meant when I wrote that the raise-error is in addition
to the standard errors.  I.e. nothing needs to be done in the DM for
this scenario.

> > Does there need to be a standard module for the NETCONF errors,
> > added as an appendix?
> 
> Yes.

No, that's not possible with the way the error statement is done,
since the identifier is error-app-tag.

> > Notably missing from the error-stmt is definition of any error-info data.
> > An open issue is whether there is some simple mechanism for defining
> > error-info, other than full-blown data-def-stmt, to define error
> > leafs.

Why can't the normal data-def stmts be used?  That would be the
obvious choice if we want to do error-info.

> > (E.g., lock-denied has the <session-id> of the current lock owner.)
> > If not, then I would rather leave it out.
> 
> Correct, this is needed. I think error-info is actually not much
> different from in and out parameters where we also use standard YANG
> constructs.

I agree.

/martin

_______________________________________________
YANG mailing list
YANG@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang