Re: [YANG] extension naming scope

Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I think the extension naming scope needs to be removed, and extensions
> need to be in the same scope as rpc, notification, and all objects.
> When converted to YIN, an extension element is in the same XML namespace
> as the object instances defined in the same module.

I don't think this is a problem.  The same thing is done in XSD, where
e.g. simpleTypes and elements have different naming scopes.  In XSD,
there can be a simpleType named 'foo' and an element named 'foo' and a
group named 'foo' at the same time.

/martin
_______________________________________________
YANG mailing list
YANG@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang