Re: [YANG] new pyang errors
Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com> Wed, 23 January 2008 09:09 UTC
Return-path: <yang-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1JHbcM-0003lX-Bg; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:09:58 -0500
Received: from yang by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1JHbcI-0003l6-Ep
for yang-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:09:54 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHbcH-0003kr-Ts
for yang@ietf.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:09:53 -0500
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se ([193.180.251.62])
by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHbcH-0006sY-8D
for yang@ietf.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:09:53 -0500
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id
D261720483; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:09:51 +0100 (CET)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-afe1dbb0000007e1-71-4797045f531a
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.124])
by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id
BE7A52171C; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:09:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.177]) by
esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:09:51 +0100
Received: from [159.107.197.224] ([159.107.197.224]) by
esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:09:51 +0100
Message-ID: <4797045E.6010608@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:09:50 +0100
From: Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070604)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: [YANG] new pyang errors
References: <200801230559.m0N5xoXf020086@idle.juniper.net> <000c01c85d89$b114eb20$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
<47970242.1040406@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <47970242.1040406@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Jan 2008 09:09:51.0357 (UTC)
FILETIME=[B5EED2D0:01C85D9F]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: f607d15ccc2bc4eaf3ade8ffa8af02a0
Cc: yang@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: yang@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: YANG modeling Language for NETCONF <yang.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang>,
<mailto:yang-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/yang>
List-Post: <mailto:yang@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang>,
<mailto:yang-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: yang-bounces@ietf.org
Actually I am much more afraid that we will get complex, non-intuitive answers to these questions then what the answers really are. I (Ericsson) personally live in a simple world. If you put something there it exists, if no it does not. So a default value exists as part of the config, it has effects. For us if a leaf does not exist in the config it has no effect whatsoever. We only use the default at creation time. I hope whatever solution we settle on will not be much more complicated then that for any of the below 7 questions. As I see it with-defaults solves 1 problem from the below 7 that is 14%. Balazs Balazs Lengyel wrote: > > Randy Presuhn wrote: >> The "with-defaults" view sounds like it would help, particularly >> if a default-ed value isn't known a priori. > > Let's not forget that the handling of defaults effect much more then the > result of the get-config. IMHO the basic question is simply "does a leaf > set only due to it's default exist?" (in the conceptual database). > > This effects the following: > 1) Does it exist? > > 2) How does edit-config create/delete work on it? E.g. can you create a > leaf that already exists(?) due to a default value? > > 3) If you later explicitly delete a leaf with a default value what > happens. Will it cease to exist? Will it automatically pop-up with the > default value again? > > 4) Is there any difference between a leaf set by the default and a leaf > explicitly (edit-config replace) set to the same value? > I really hope not. > > 5) Will get-config return such a leaf? > It may or may not depending on the implementation or the with-defaults > option > > 6) Will a non-presence container exist if it has leafs set by default? > This will effect how edit-config none is handled. > > 7) Does a "must" statement consider such leafs to exist. > I assume yes. > > Balazs > > > _______________________________________________ > YANG mailing list > YANG@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang -- Balazs Lengyel Ericsson Hungary Ltd. TSP System Manager ECN: 831 7320 Fax: +36 1 4377792 Tel: +36-1-437-7320 email: Balazs.Lengyel@ericsson.com _______________________________________________ YANG mailing list YANG@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang
- [YANG] new pyang errors Andy Bierman
- [YANG] new pyang errors Andy Bierman
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Andy Bierman
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Andy Bierman
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Andy Bierman
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Andy Bierman
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Randy Presuhn
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Andy Bierman
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Randy Presuhn
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Andy Bierman
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Andy Bierman
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Randy Presuhn
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- [YANG] meaning of unique in PDUs Ladislav Lhotka
- RE: [YANG] new pyang errors Bert Wijnen
- Re: [YANG] meaning of unique in PDUs Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] meaning of unique in PDUs Ladislav Lhotka
- RE: [YANG] new pyang errors Bert Wijnen