Re: [YANG] so many naming scopes

"tom.petch" writes:
>Yes, I expressed myself strongly, perhaps as a result of spending time in 2007
>with XML documents where there was widespread use of an element named <element>
>as well as one named <attribute>; I wish that XML had reserved those words:-(  I

That might sounds wise up until the moment when you need to define
XML for chemical elements (<element>helium</>) or character attributes
(<attribute>fluffy</>).  Forcing folks to choose non-obvious words
because the DML uses them is bad.  key and index are two examples
where the modeler should be able to use them if they are exactly
the term they need.

Thanks,
 Phil

_______________________________________________
YANG mailing list
YANG@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang