Re: [YANG] new pyang errors

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@cesnet.cz> Wed, 23 January 2008 09:32 UTC

Return-path: <yang-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHbyA-0001xa-Vy; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:32:30 -0500
Received: from yang by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JHbyA-0001v8-2V for yang-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:32:30 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHby9-0001uz-ON for yang@ietf.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:32:29 -0500
Received: from office2.cesnet.cz ([195.113.144.244]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHby9-0007c5-Aw for yang@ietf.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:32:29 -0500
Received: from [172.29.2.201] (asus-gx.lhotka.cesnet.cz [195.113.161.161]) by office2.cesnet.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B5CD80098 for <yang@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:32:28 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: [YANG] new pyang errors
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@cesnet.cz>
To: yang@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <4796FCFD.5000102@ericsson.com>
References: <200801230559.m0N5xoXf020086@idle.juniper.net> <1201074051.17304.35.camel@missotis> <20080123074427.GE7105@elstar.local> <1201076756.17304.62.camel@missotis> <4796FCFD.5000102@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Organization: CESNET
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:32:28 +0100
Message-Id: <1201080748.17304.98.camel@missotis>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9ed51c9d1356100bce94f1ae4ec616a9
X-BeenThere: yang@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: YANG modeling Language for NETCONF <yang.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang>, <mailto:yang-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/yang>
List-Post: <mailto:yang@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang>, <mailto:yang-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: yang-bounces@ietf.org

Balazs Lengyel píše v St 23. 01. 2008 v 09:38 +0100:
> 
> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > Juergen Schoenwaelder píše v St 23. 01. 2008 v 08:44 +0100:
> >> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 08:40:51AM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >>
> >>> I agree, but im my view of the NETCONF world this (optional) filtering
> >>> can and should be done at the user's side, by the management
> >>> application. The size/complexity of the data is not an issue for
> >>> machine-machine exchange.
> >> a) ssh is not going to do that for me anytime soon
> > 
> > It's important that raw ssh works in principle but let's face it -
> > reading and typing NETCONF XML stuff via stdin/stdout is only for
> > masochists.
> >  
> Our testers very often write the NETCONF requests/replies in a file, and send that over SSH.
> So while Netconf is not a CLI, we do use raw SSH. I also think operators stated they like to 
> understand raw output.

Of course, developers and testers must sometimes do such awkward things
with other network protocols, too. But for production use, the minimum
requirement for me is that end users (humans) use a decent readable
syntax, which XML generated by a machine isn't. So some processing on
the client side will IMO always be necessary.

Lada

> Balazs
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> YANG mailing list
> YANG@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang
-- 
Ladislav Lhotka, CESNET
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C



_______________________________________________
YANG mailing list
YANG@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang