Re: [YANG] new pyang errors
Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com> Thu, 24 January 2008 08:48 UTC
Return-path: <yang-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1JHxlX-0006QL-HD; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:48:55 -0500
Received: from yang by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1JHxlV-0006QA-8J
for yang-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:48:53 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHxlU-0006Q1-RL
for yang@ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:48:52 -0500
Received: from mailgw3.ericsson.se ([193.180.251.60])
by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHxlU-0003WJ-EL
for yang@ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:48:52 -0500
Received: from mailgw3.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by mailgw3.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id
6B49520D63; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:48:51 +0100 (CET)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3c-aa2ecbb0000007e0-81-479850f3b412
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.122])
by mailgw3.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id
4F8F7209F2; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:48:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.177]) by
esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:48:51 +0100
Received: from [159.107.197.224] ([159.107.197.224]) by
esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:48:50 +0100
Message-ID: <479850F2.8090106@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:48:50 +0100
From: Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070604)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [YANG] new pyang errors
References: <200801232035.m0NKZamr024518@idle.juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <200801232035.m0NKZamr024518@idle.juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jan 2008 08:48:50.0802 (UTC)
FILETIME=[F0FF2520:01C85E65]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17
Cc: yang@ietf.org, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@cesnet.cz>
X-BeenThere: yang@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: YANG modeling Language for NETCONF <yang.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang>,
<mailto:yang-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/yang>
List-Post: <mailto:yang@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang>,
<mailto:yang-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: yang-bounces@ietf.org
For us the default would be: give me the full config with all defaults; and the option, without-defaults. But I agree that both solutions have value. Balazs Phil Shafer wrote: > Andy Bierman writes: >> huh -- it uses up an extra second of bandwidth so the system is fragile? > > No, the human element is fragile. Having a config file littered > with values that the user didn't ask for and doesn't need it a > great way to help them ignore the parts of the config that they > did ask for and do need. > >> There are lots of scenarios that cause an operator or application >> to need to full configuration, not just the values that do not have >> the default value. > > If you see a value in this, make it an option to <get-config>. > It should not be the default behaviour. > > Thanks, > Phil > > > _______________________________________________ > YANG mailing list > YANG@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang -- Balazs Lengyel Ericsson Hungary Ltd. TSP System Manager ECN: 831 7320 Fax: +36 1 4377792 Tel: +36-1-437-7320 email: Balazs.Lengyel@ericsson.com _______________________________________________ YANG mailing list YANG@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang
- [YANG] new pyang errors Andy Bierman
- [YANG] new pyang errors Andy Bierman
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Andy Bierman
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Andy Bierman
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Andy Bierman
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Andy Bierman
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Randy Presuhn
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Andy Bierman
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Randy Presuhn
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Andy Bierman
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Andy Bierman
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Randy Presuhn
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Phil Shafer
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Ladislav Lhotka
- [YANG] meaning of unique in PDUs Ladislav Lhotka
- RE: [YANG] new pyang errors Bert Wijnen
- Re: [YANG] meaning of unique in PDUs Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] new pyang errors Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [YANG] meaning of unique in PDUs Ladislav Lhotka
- RE: [YANG] new pyang errors Bert Wijnen