Re: [YANG] new pyang errors

Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com> wrote:
> Andy Bierman wrote:
> > Phil Shafer wrote:
> 
> 
>  >...
> 
> Perhaps you want to revive the debate on the NGO list
> about the 'with-defaults' extension?
> 
> The consensus was that both views of the configuration database
> are useful, and the protocol should support both of them.

The intention with the YANG solution is to support both these views,
and also support systems that implements the with-default capability.

> Without the 'full' view, how is a manager supposed to know
> whether a leaf is really there with the default value, or
> not supported by the agent or supported but not used in this instance.

Now you're touching on the conformance / capabilities problem...
Currently in YANG this is pretty coarse-grained, on the module level.

/martin

_______________________________________________
YANG mailing list
YANG@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang