Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03
Tom Herbert
2016-06-02
int-area
None
/arch/msg/int-area/ew_PXPOdRfGUHVCwRjgClne5Fog/
2217498
1412210
Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03
Joe Touch
2016-06-02
int-area
None
/arch/msg/int-area/pQAleJbmC-6pg6Jb5oTfnStAmc4/
2217476
1412210
Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03
Tom Herbert
2016-06-01
int-area
None
/arch/msg/int-area/J-WtfGAI3cXQHTsEUPSu7v3_epg/
2217475
1412210
Re: [Softwires] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.Re: [Softwires] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.
Tom Herbert
2016-05-30
softwires
None
/arch/msg/softwires/X87ZQ_-HqBlaz37rxgZLch5NFJg/
2216164
1628897
Re: [nvo3] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.Re: [nvo3] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.
Tom Herbert
2016-05-30
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/go1rQRWKtj_niMWNV1LSW184Uzs/
2216165
1525296
Re: [lisp] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.Re: [lisp] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.
Tom Herbert
2016-05-30
lisp
None
/arch/msg/lisp/Xbf24Nx-IDqWqRkJmKS24MZPY6M/
2216162
1465481
Re: [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.Re: [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.
Tom Herbert
2016-05-30
int-area
None
/arch/msg/int-area/ZFY6DPv0VQMoiqHCWPOhkWJ9XgI/
2216163
1412210
Re: [tsvwg] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.Re: [tsvwg] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.
Tom Herbert
2016-05-30
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/UT1MvfvdLRvuiIO56xzOY_QsOJ0/
2216161
1651352
Re: [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.Re: [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.
Xuxiaohu
2016-05-28
int-area
None
/arch/msg/int-area/pZSXAlftm3zqV1b9XHrO-A5UDJ8/
2215815
1412210
Re: [nvo3] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.Re: [nvo3] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.
Xuxiaohu
2016-05-28
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/_u14suWkCQ38is-M_judx1RYvWg/
2215816
1525296
Re: [lisp] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.Re: [lisp] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.
Xuxiaohu
2016-05-28
lisp
None
/arch/msg/lisp/6t16pMmBvxGYwUAT42495lmMyAI/
2215817
1465481
Re: [tsvwg] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.Re: [tsvwg] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.
Xuxiaohu
2016-05-28
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/1rvQrJ6HDzVHErlR7QYrx_STWgI/
2215818
1651352
Re: [Softwires] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.Re: [Softwires] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.
Xuxiaohu
2016-05-28
softwires
None
/arch/msg/softwires/zVAympIj9177Y97sW4vo7FrVjBM/
2215819
1628897
Re: [tsvwg] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.Re: [tsvwg] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.
Tom Herbert
2016-05-27
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/iDw2mSz-qO9aZwUSPOJ-Ur-JYFc/
2215503
1651352
Re: [lisp] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.Re: [lisp] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.
Tom Herbert
2016-05-27
lisp
None
/arch/msg/lisp/VBwFd7fvJGzjAl-Nz-AHV8H6NVs/
2215501
1465481
Re: [nvo3] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.Re: [nvo3] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.
Tom Herbert
2016-05-27
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/XyGs2cQGb65xqZsXrDH4yIjA3_s/
2215502
1525296
Re: [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.Re: [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.
Tom Herbert
2016-05-27
int-area
None
/arch/msg/int-area/K5V7iGDG8gwMbXhTieZK7J3yANw/
2215499
1412210
Re: [Softwires] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.Re: [Softwires] [Int-area] Is it feasible to perform fragmentation on UDP encapsulated packets.
Tom Herbert
2016-05-27
softwires
None
/arch/msg/softwires/kXLCHxj_NGDzFZW2m93-ahW794w/
2215500
1628897
Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03
Templin, Fred L
2016-05-26
int-area
None
/arch/msg/int-area/vBSubgMSxq0VdKpAnBLwuHbuAM4/
2214798
1412210
Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
Alexey Eromenko
2016-02-11
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/gL3FL_0y88-skkyGl8s0MT8p770/
2157314
1339186
RE: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?RE: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?
Templin, Fred L
2016-02-10
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/DxbhvT1fGzqzvTib8mUsuby8w50/
2157179
1339186
RE: Use cases for PMTUD and PLPMTUD (was: RE: 6MAN: Adoption call on draft-hinden-6man-rfc1981bis-01)RE: Use cases for PMTUD and PLPMTUD (was: RE: 6MAN: Adoption call on draft-hinden-6man-rfc1981bis-01)
Templin, Fred L
2016-02-08
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/iK_h_Cm8uOj3eI-5nD22DCOY-iY/
2155836
1436924
I-D Action: draft-herbert-gue-fragmentation-02.txtI-D Action: draft-herbert-gue-fragmentation-02.txt
internet-drafts
2015-10-19
i-d-announce
None
/arch/msg/i-d-announce/8lzqtW_25kaDNSCh7baqcDwZjXo/
2099500
1174660
I-D Action: draft-herbert-gue-fragmentation-01.txtI-D Action: draft-herbert-gue-fragmentation-01.txt
internet-drafts
2015-10-19
i-d-announce
None
/arch/msg/i-d-announce/imi1ktEYFizpBKyT4cRoJu5R0Js/
2099367
1174703
[Int-area] tunnel fragmentation[Int-area] tunnel fragmentation
Templin, Fred L
2015-10-14
int-area
None
/arch/msg/int-area/0Jy5flM9QIHk-tETHqhJO3R2n_c/
2095545
1412250
Re: [Int-area] Why combine IP-in-UDP with GUE?Re: [Int-area] Why combine IP-in-UDP with GUE?
Templin, Fred L
2015-04-28
int-area
None
/arch/msg/int-area/qcuQqJCJ31c0AlNloOcm5_ObJhs/
2012719
1412305
Re: [Int-area] Why combine IP-in-UDP with GUE?Re: [Int-area] Why combine IP-in-UDP with GUE?
Tom Herbert
2015-04-28
int-area
None
/arch/msg/int-area/7uLz-bGQbjukJdL732QkFUkeA9I/
2012538
1412305
Re: [Int-area] Why combine IP-in-UDP with GUE?Re: [Int-area] Why combine IP-in-UDP with GUE?
Templin, Fred L
2015-04-28
int-area
None
/arch/msg/int-area/-dpW3Qa7Q24HIF4NH4-NPpLI648/
2012502
1412305
Re: [Int-area] Why combine IP-in-UDP with GUE?Re: [Int-area] Why combine IP-in-UDP with GUE?
Tom Herbert
2015-04-28
int-area
None
/arch/msg/int-area/nL5dbqL5L-eHjQf_vbmQZHa5QDQ/
2012094
1412305
Re: [Int-area] Why combine IP-in-UDP with GUE?Re: [Int-area] Why combine IP-in-UDP with GUE?
Joe Touch
2015-04-27
int-area
None
/arch/msg/int-area/fxKPHIkABF5j9YwticGclgSVrrY/
2012086
1412305
Re: [Int-area] Why combine IP-in-UDP with GUE?Re: [Int-area] Why combine IP-in-UDP with GUE?
Tom Herbert
2015-04-27
int-area
None
/arch/msg/int-area/4A_EA-NPz4up8_liWpvhRs-imK0/
2012082
1412305
Re: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerationsRe: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerations
Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
2015-04-24
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/UkjKRqoDZywr-Y-qxO8L83VGLO8/
2010492
1525443
Re: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerationsRe: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerations
Larry Kreeger (kreeger)
2015-04-14
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/kbUYlWtTewyjo-kM2qtG1hfGGqE/
1932893
1525443
Re: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerationsRe: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerations
Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
2015-04-12
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/InggQc9AF2iMEjngyQaYEG4ik54/
1932217
1525443
Re: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerationsRe: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerations
Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
2015-04-12
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/Kzng8T-aZ5Fdj2vspt2_I6r8vb4/
1932211
1525443
Re: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerationsRe: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerations
Anoop Ghanwani
2015-04-10
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/2oVhghyf27GIrJHgSWQ2bnW-8Lw/
1931957
1525443
Re: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerationsRe: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerations
Larry Kreeger (kreeger)
2015-04-10
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/kBAzOBHcrpUs0--xAnh1dZLWGnA/
1931893
1525443
Re: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerationsRe: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerations
Tom Herbert
2015-04-10
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/8iu3fOsn8FtE89xLt2Mn0o2oqfg/
1931877
1525443
Re: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerationsRe: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerations
Anoop Ghanwani
2015-04-10
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/PHdBZ5wwnFJm7D8pdGnKl6bVUa8/
1931868
1525443
Re: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerationsRe: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerations
Larry Kreeger (kreeger)
2015-04-10
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/nSlodh4qj1Mbs7UAHuBoAmPFbes/
1931851
1525443