[rfc-dist] RFC 9360 on CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Header Parameters for Carrying and Referencing X.509 Certificates[rfc-dist] RFC 9360 on CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Header Parameters for Carrying and Referencing X.509 Certificates
rfc-editor
2023-02-16
rfc-dist
None
/arch/msg/rfc-dist/lMwYroih8NsCxqeeTECxwm8q4TU/
3276996
2051724
[COSE] RFC 9360 on CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Header Parameters for Carrying and Referencing X.509 Certificates[COSE] RFC 9360 on CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Header Parameters for Carrying and Referencing X.509 Certificates
rfc-editor
2023-02-16
cose
None
/arch/msg/cose/9MAxnUNNyzv2qpMt8p3_ghyxvvs/
3276994
2051722
RFC 9360 on CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Header Parameters for Carrying and Referencing X.509 CertificatesRFC 9360 on CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Header Parameters for Carrying and Referencing X.509 Certificates
rfc-editor
2023-02-16
ietf-announce
None
/arch/msg/ietf-announce/wWCrcAYdAilPLlb3hJtcEC1Ehr4/
3276995
2051723
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-02-09
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/d7Mi_7eCSOLgghwrf_SEABba7PM/
3274483
2048568
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review
Matthew Miller
2023-02-09
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/4QZJE4phdWmAOG2zGq2k1plcnQs/
3274373
2048568
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-02-08
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/Bsc1BCYiGY0O-t0WI4mdCtlMouk/
3273990
2048568
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review
Paul Wouters
2023-02-07
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/IaxVvb2j6k7yk98z03ogjqSYy24/
3273617
2048568
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-02-07
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/4D8x2IridGosjdxiURz04rZrZXw/
3273608
2048568
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review
Paul Wouters
2023-02-07
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/ZGAJY9mIO9rR2yP917bblMNB-Vs/
3273553
2048568
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-02-06
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/IW9BhToUTXZJzY4ldRq9-0mlN88/
3273229
2048568
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review
Paul Wouters
2023-02-06
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/UoIklDQ3ygw30iXYZJUrd_BXnCs/
3273221
2048568
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review
Matthew Miller
2023-02-06
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/070PGJ3H2y6RAwFRqCvIuOb2amg/
3273133
2048568
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review
Paul Wouters
2023-02-06
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/bp_9-uQ4u7slsz6YSz8Pr_P1lGw/
3272985
2048568
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-02-04
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/oAdhmlIIAvUtGzvUO3o7MT_8NAY/
3272713
2048568
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review
Paul Wouters
2023-02-04
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/lvXgJIPLvnm6U9gN0L5gB0GJKzA/
3272709
2048568
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review
Matthew Miller
2023-02-03
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/9zMUAaQezuUnePFXR4wFkvJEOzk/
3272667
2048568
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review
Paul Wouters
2023-02-03
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/WMvBRKslBuuAJRxwwILWdENsJpI/
3272659
2048568
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review
Matthew Miller
2023-02-03
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/oY6SHq8LGe97UaQN5sfKzRuUpaA/
3272652
2048568
[auth48] *[AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review[auth48] *[AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-02-03
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/IaB06q2XDTORhbt7JK2TD3yFMaY/
3272631
2048568
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review
rfc-editor
2023-01-25
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/7bPbkqjFqREsfYzm8dayNZfAOcs/
3269011
2048568
[auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review[auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9360 <draft-ietf-cose-x509-09> for your review
rfc-editor
2023-01-25
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/OL_hzOazO7NIt9DjL-lg_oBsouo/
3269009
2048568
[COSE] Protocol Action: 'CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Header parameters for carrying and referencing X.509 certificates' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-cose-x509-09.txt)[COSE] Protocol Action: 'CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Header parameters for carrying and referencing X.509 certificates' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-cose-x509-09.txt)
The IESG
2022-10-13
cose
None
/arch/msg/cose/wg--BiAtyjWxGdCdPGd40H53JB8/
3234657
2033834
Protocol Action: 'CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Header parameters for carrying and referencing X.509 certificates' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-cose-x509-09.txt)Protocol Action: 'CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Header parameters for carrying and referencing X.509 certificates' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-cose-x509-09.txt)
The IESG
2022-10-13
ietf-announce
None
/arch/msg/ietf-announce/-HZS9dOsOUmNRx4MUtm68yYol0o/
3234658
2033835
[COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-x509-09.txt[COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-x509-09.txt
internet-drafts
2022-10-13
cose
None
/arch/msg/cose/K9XR4XPTdaJyr5ym-t8hNMb3gc0/
3234575
2033781
I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-x509-09.txtI-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-x509-09.txt
internet-drafts
2022-10-13
i-d-announce
None
/arch/msg/i-d-announce/iWv7ZX-3Lax6aoyX1yajT5Gx8Gk/
3234576
2033782
Re: [SCITT] [EXTERNAL] Re: [COSE] SCITT receipts as COSE V2 countersignaturesRe: [SCITT] [EXTERNAL] Re: [COSE] SCITT receipts as COSE V2 countersignatures
Maik Riechert
2022-10-05
scitt
None
/arch/msg/scitt/KiExKxgHa5pRTOmDHV2YfWLeFcQ/
3230858
2032078
Re: [COSE] [EXTERNAL] Re: [SCITT] SCITT receipts as COSE V2 countersignaturesRe: [COSE] [EXTERNAL] Re: [SCITT] SCITT receipts as COSE V2 countersignatures
Maik Riechert
2022-10-05
cose
None
/arch/msg/cose/8dujVzQ6CuWVCFYqxweZR5wkO1M/
3230859
2032077
Re: [Rats] Why variability is needed (Re: EAT Profiles)Re: [Rats] Why variability is needed (Re: EAT Profiles)
Smith, Ned
2022-09-19
rats
None
/arch/msg/rats/l0ZMYq_ZKe6s1vNqyGN6qx03ktM/
3223709
2028824
Re: [Rats] Why variability is needed (Re: EAT Profiles)Re: [Rats] Why variability is needed (Re: EAT Profiles)
Michael Richardson
2022-09-17
rats
None
/arch/msg/rats/3dWweOUe1eqa5z_qKvjPUgkwHwY/
3223321
2028824
[Rats] Why variability is needed (Re: EAT Profiles)[Rats] Why variability is needed (Re: EAT Profiles)
Laurence Lundblade
2022-09-16
rats
None
/arch/msg/rats/I-MvfASruU7cSjXntxQd2GoPjSM/
3223089
2028824
Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)
Giridhar Mandyam
2022-06-06
rats
None
/arch/msg/rats/-xw5J8sccOqaxSjhk0YlIglHODo/
3186508
2013997
Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)
Laurence Lundblade
2022-06-06
rats
None
/arch/msg/rats/twrjaaf_b0agSv96EPT2wG2gnMk/
3186449
2013997
Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)
Eric Voit (evoit)
2022-06-06
rats
None
/arch/msg/rats/CUm813Wl7zvTdef-qHOfdJBtywM/
3186438
2013997
Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)
Giridhar Mandyam
2022-06-06
rats
None
/arch/msg/rats/l5KspFLb2wHVTMv0Tp5XaOmNkpQ/
3186399
2013997
Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)
Henk Birkholz
2022-06-06
rats
None
/arch/msg/rats/4uzKkBlz0Q4i-459EEpl_708YTI/
3186391
2013997
Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)
Eric Voit (evoit)
2022-06-06
rats
None
/arch/msg/rats/lOfn59gi1jyzgBo-78pxF9LDROg/
3186372
2013997
Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)
Giridhar Mandyam
2022-06-04
rats
None
/arch/msg/rats/x2H_R-K5JFIRwVpex2XIkkxcedA/
3186086
2013997
Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)
Smith, Ned
2022-06-04
rats
None
/arch/msg/rats/PmaPSDO1UJE2MICVOVfsvDCnGoE/
3186033
2013997
Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)
Eric Voit (evoit)
2022-06-03
rats
None
/arch/msg/rats/uqVfMrjj1Yz0_-SmOQWthWwkn3M/
3185928
2013997
Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)Re: [Rats] security-level claim (was Re: WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rats-eat)
Giridhar Mandyam
2022-06-03
rats
None
/arch/msg/rats/lOCuiNOtd1dcuSLKzY7kJS_StHQ/
3185898
2013997