Re: [dispatch] BEHAVE for B2BUAs charter proposalRe: [dispatch] BEHAVE for B2BUAs charter proposal
Olle E. Johansson
2011-10-31
dispatch
None
/arch/msg/dispatch/megoB9WHFYp4CWoqRtZCk6Q_Pho/
352219
1121012
Re: [dispatch] BEHAVE for B2BUAs charter proposalRe: [dispatch] BEHAVE for B2BUAs charter proposal
Hadriel Kaplan
2011-10-31
dispatch
None
/arch/msg/dispatch/_6n-MqDy5Y8MeiBxSkqPD2om2eM/
352217
1121012
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Dan Wing
2009-04-13
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/jGNu7RuBqZa4-BVRq40CEiAK8IU/
1351203
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Jon Peterson
2009-04-13
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/697UJV_FhKvL6ugRLbsLddFDWTI/
1351202
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Dan Wing
2009-04-13
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/8bz6OpIxzn-oDUV7nP6Bo7WLeKU/
1351200
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Jiri Kuthan
2009-04-07
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/Pag93lUZF6HHiWdd5rDS1t0rzbM/
1351141
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Dean Willis
2009-04-07
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/cCioXHi3EslHHBIPYJCAb0tTyVU/
1351139
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Francois Audet
2009-04-06
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/m7jrr_YIrRUHsZhR80HjV4pte7k/
1351138
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Dan Wing
2009-04-05
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/_Xq_x4IITmn7fXi5Fq6udNlX54w/
1351135
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Cullen Jennings
2009-04-04
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/gNdhR1uQbVOWcZqBErsPaf4F7Q8/
1351132
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Dan Wing
2009-04-03
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/wcX3jb_GG1Ka2b_aoEph2n_hppo/
1351126
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Francois Audet
2009-04-03
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/-B_CHYikFGdWjjvnmPoaEbkKF_4/
1351125
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Dan Wing
2009-04-03
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/z9pSz0sgwol9SNikhf8t10iBqyI/
1351124
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Francois Audet
2009-04-03
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/2zXC6-fT2ggPTxQqIFIkAO9BKbk/
1351123
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Dan Wing
2009-04-03
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/87_ckSfpKbd5v5GMcQuQ6votjaM/
1351122
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Francois Audet
2009-04-03
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/0ZAlcRLa6b9-w3srsqqHz9dhprI/
1351120
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Dan Wing
2009-04-03
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/UL2MMICC569JC2aDeAb1D7xSHyU/
1351119
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Dan Wing
2009-04-03
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/-7-ZWWRG6anZJV2VVrQs2XqCYt8/
1351118
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Francois Audet
2009-04-03
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/oWT1U-oulLKIzFy-EZtafcW_igo/
1351117
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Dan Wing
2009-04-03
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/37DtrJhzRcFBJqzByAmSIcGBkSY/
1351116
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Dean Willis
2009-04-03
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/HtTRuhRP57PQCb1KQosWI9VTJs4/
1351106
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Francois Audet
2009-04-02
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/PfZ-mF97lm-QXM1zDUhxRKcgrqc/
1351094
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Francois Audet
2009-04-01
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/fnJnQZWMV8wSxmAx-hNNMcX_hjY/
1351063
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Dan Wing
2009-03-31
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/2GARVPjo5yKEfyqphXpOLBhags8/
1351027
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Dean Willis
2009-03-30
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/uRlzmTze48vjUWYt7nYxZkmCXUQ/
1351003
1607508
Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the fieldRe: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Dan Wing
2009-03-30
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/JPIGMqKtxPXkG-KYhY5pJFn46eQ/
1350990
1607508
Re: [Sip] Another possible limitation of DERIVERe: [Sip] Another possible limitation of DERIVE
Dan Wing
2008-11-19
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/i53mE-TLpcK34lx6xLoy7LB6-TA/
1349721
1607698
Re: [Sip] Comment on DERIVE and B2BUAsRe: [Sip] Comment on DERIVE and B2BUAs
Elwell, John
2008-10-30
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/iyMb1DH5ilp52MuXoMCZASQSd74/
1349355
1607787
Re: [Sip] Comment on DERIVE and B2BUAsRe: [Sip] Comment on DERIVE and B2BUAs
Dan Wing
2008-10-30
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/NoHtdGCa-_IptywL6fhQpddb10Q/
1349351
1607787
Re: [Sip] submission of a new I-D: "Dialog Event foR IdentityVErification"Re: [Sip] submission of a new I-D: "Dialog Event foR IdentityVErification"
Henry Sinnreich
2008-10-29
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/Tac-Kn53pwg16Ogo2nglBx4VEuc/
1349324
1607787
Re: [Sip] submission of a new I-D: "Dialog Event foR IdentityVErification"Re: [Sip] submission of a new I-D: "Dialog Event foR IdentityVErification"
Dan Wing
2008-10-29
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/B-dJH1TkPpw7_xTZDSwQ0hIwugQ/
1349314
1607787
Re: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issuesRe: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issues
Dan Wing
2008-08-09
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/ay2xOEErOW-kHpjbdhw6OmVfTPo/
1348571
1607914
Re: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issuesRe: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issues
Eric Rescorla
2008-08-07
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/8rlbpuiPAm2N1L4gQT4Hnk-T9g8/
1348562
1607914
Re: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issuesRe: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issues
Dan Wing
2008-08-06
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/SemtT26GdCti9fhtxV61CK2B0pQ/
1348536
1607914
Re: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issuesRe: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issues
Cullen Jennings
2008-08-06
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/gH9relhOvngcU2F31GGMz0bUTbk/
1348526
1607914
Re: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issuesRe: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issues
Eric Rescorla
2008-08-06
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/QLxaqCrE650lEc5rFDrM-kizVdw/
1348519
1607914
Re: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issuesRe: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issues
Dan Wing
2008-08-05
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/gMgeVa4Bh953AjWrodD-oq0lQ3I/
1348517
1607914
Re: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issuesRe: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issues
Dan Wing
2008-08-05
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/xigH7TEsEyHnLTxu48_0_naDA5Q/
1348508
1607914
Re: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issuesRe: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issues
Eric Rescorla
2008-08-05
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/YccrapWHfNYMTbbgDh-keDEJ1Ls/
1348502
1607914
Re: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issuesRe: [Sip] Thoughts on SIP Identity issues
Dan Wing
2008-08-05
sip
None
/arch/msg/sip/ULELAujAdvWu4Bozp-biTuzpcO0/
1348501
1607914