[Rswg] Presentation consistency (Re: Making the RFC 9280 text more specific[Rswg] Presentation consistency (Re: Making the RFC 9280 text more specific
Jean Mahoney
2024-03-07
rswg
None
/arch/msg/rswg/fkBvwZ7bETcoYJWf2jbZaPEdQEo/
3434290
2122891
Re: [COSE] AD Review of draft-ietf-cose-countersign-05Re: [COSE] AD Review of draft-ietf-cose-countersign-05
Michael Richardson
2022-05-13
cose
None
/arch/msg/cose/PDboWSs7o0DRMGS-dl6TUX9JYx0/
3179538
2010607
Re: [lp-wan] SCHC Yang module reviewRe: [lp-wan] SCHC Yang module review
Laurent Toutain
2021-12-14
lp-wan
None
/arch/msg/lp-wan/IHVb9-fGmivNOtgqW_PKVqphP28/
3103849
1983724
Re: [spring] [Spring] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment/Re: [spring] [Spring] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment/
Gyan Mishra
2021-09-30
spring
None
/arch/msg/spring/FVeFx7qCMkpYHQdaKvichngkoVs/
3078671
1961788
Re: [spring] [Spring] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment/Re: [spring] [Spring] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment/
Chengli (Cheng Li)
2021-09-28
spring
None
/arch/msg/spring/riXfG_mW6vsZZfkYuCcZQY0kJk4/
3077873
1961788
Re: [spring] [Spring] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment/Re: [spring] [Spring] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment/
Gyan Mishra
2021-09-27
spring
None
/arch/msg/spring/rgMaP_inopU4DHvMc2jYFxD2lmc/
3077698
1961788
Re: [v6ops] RFC 2119 language in an informational draft?Re: [v6ops] RFC 2119 language in an informational draft?
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
2021-08-06
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/AQ3nXYxXRhM0z6vADQi39VoZUQQ/
3062232
1966410
Re: [v6ops] RFC 2119 language in an informational draft?Re: [v6ops] RFC 2119 language in an informational draft?
STARK, BARBARA H
2021-08-06
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/aSbJoaNCWMNeMq0J-LCvxpTSkJk/
3062230
1966410
Re: [v6ops] RFC 2119 language in an informational draft?Re: [v6ops] RFC 2119 language in an informational draft?
Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
2021-08-06
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/LGqGPd4sgYkNEC5UXH_TkLaE-_8/
3062134
1966410
Re: [v6ops] RFC 2119 language in an informational draft?Re: [v6ops] RFC 2119 language in an informational draft?
Jen Linkova
2021-08-06
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/OfwO5_pa8j37yzkBRTfOM4V7KEE/
3062096
1966410
Re: [v6ops] RFC 2119 language in an informational draft?Re: [v6ops] RFC 2119 language in an informational draft?
Warren Kumari
2021-08-05
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/sCwmumbGl29bzlGeCCYXqoyi0Io/
3061825
1966410
Re: [Json] JSON or I-JSON?Re: [Json] JSON or I-JSON?
Pete Cordell
2021-02-26
json
None
/arch/msg/json/R8N48GCU1K26nGLxTZX2wYiaQao/
3003261
1941557
Re: [Json] JSON or I-JSON?Re: [Json] JSON or I-JSON?
Carsten Bormann
2021-02-26
json
None
/arch/msg/json/J1imgPcnTVwy4pLkD3KHugOwwHs/
3003223
1941557
Re: [rfc-i] t with indentRe: [rfc-i] t with indent
Julian Reschke
2020-12-30
rfc-interest
None
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/JSLBW0gse9SSL9DEiuiRXNAe6lY/
2979342
1931294
Re: [rfc-i] t with indentRe: [rfc-i] t with indent
John R Levine
2020-12-29
rfc-interest
None
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/99JsjYnBAiL2CuXI9ciieLcchRI/
2979294
1931294
Re: [Anima] Russ/Ben: Re: Russ Housley's review of draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-25Re: [Anima] Russ/Ben: Re: Russ Housley's review of draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-25
Toerless Eckert
2020-07-01
anima
None
/arch/msg/anima/_-O4Ky6VRxEvG7fTx7Db14gbYMY/
2897920
1900831
Re: [Anima] Russ/Ben: Re: Russ Housley's review of draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-25Re: [Anima] Russ/Ben: Re: Russ Housley's review of draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-25
Russ Housley
2020-07-01
anima
None
/arch/msg/anima/r59nWsxMKFI968uMpKIgaBXp6Eg/
2897892
1900831
Re: [Anima] Russ/Ben: Re: Russ Housley's review of draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-25Re: [Anima] Russ/Ben: Re: Russ Housley's review of draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-25
Toerless Eckert
2020-07-01
anima
None
/arch/msg/anima/kZ7DJ_m6x0nNSleJ-6CbkrovU8c/
2897887
1900831
Re: [Anima] [lamps] on certification authorities.Re: [Anima] [lamps] on certification authorities.
Toerless Eckert
2020-06-27
anima
None
/arch/msg/anima/h7gZnONOAU5OfNHlun9kc4WBjJ0/
2896395
1900831
Re: [Anima] Russ/Ben: Re: Russ Housley's review of draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-24Re: [Anima] Russ/Ben: Re: Russ Housley's review of draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-24
Russ Housley
2020-06-24
anima
None
/arch/msg/anima/J9mX0mMPeXmjt7qkVA6rJC3U7dU/
2895249
1900831
[Anima] Russ/Ben: Re: Russ Housley's review of draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-24[Anima] Russ/Ben: Re: Russ Housley's review of draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-24
Toerless Eckert
2020-06-24
anima
None
/arch/msg/anima/4Qil0N2FhckzW7Qh70ItSGvdpko/
2894916
1900831
Re: [Tools-discuss] missing RFC numbers: 404 vs. "was never issued"Re: [Tools-discuss] missing RFC numbers: 404 vs. "was never issued"
Bob Hinden
2018-12-12
tools-discuss
None
/arch/msg/tools-discuss/DAbSpQCLWmZjSsN9jhLOTP728eU/
2671450
1819063
Re: [Tools-discuss] missing RFC numbers: 404 vs. "was never issued"Re: [Tools-discuss] missing RFC numbers: 404 vs. "was never issued"
Sandy Ginoza
2018-12-11
tools-discuss
None
/arch/msg/tools-discuss/FkKwJcESZvIAQi8hBwkCyWPQ1GQ/
2671132
1819063
Re: [Tools-discuss] missing RFC numbers: 404 vs. "was never issued"Re: [Tools-discuss] missing RFC numbers: 404 vs. "was never issued"
Brian E Carpenter
2018-12-11
tools-discuss
None
/arch/msg/tools-discuss/na_j7X1iZUCItyW4hcaxmrSLVWo/
2671112
1819063
[Tools-discuss] missing RFC numbers: 404 vs. "was never issued"[Tools-discuss] missing RFC numbers: 404 vs. "was never issued"
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2018-12-11
tools-discuss
None
/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Zg8C_VjAatz-KE2P73Ce93mLCzo/
2671044
1819063