Re: [websec] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)Re: [websec] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)
Tobias Gondrom
2013-08-17
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/D9K46rKft3Hi1ha1hSU9c5OpjlM/
1505337
1665078
Re: [websec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-08: (with COMMENT)Re: [websec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-08: (with COMMENT)
Tobias Gondrom
2013-08-13
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/29uq5XnEWXmo1kT-sZ6fBPpoTuo/
1505300
1665084
Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-07Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-07
Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
2013-08-12
secdir
None
/arch/msg/secdir/6buZqEPWmX_V4cNuEHkw29nFQgk/
1288966
1596982
Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-07Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-07
Tobias Gondrom
2013-08-11
secdir
None
/arch/msg/secdir/ifrbB3LEtmFl6LG6TfRHYDEJSiE/
1288964
1596982
Re: [websec] #60: Well Known URIs vs Response HeadersRe: [websec] #60: Well Known URIs vs Response Headers
Tobias Gondrom
2013-08-01
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/Pl-NRY9TLHOhuHJk2prGdcyx_uQ/
1505212
1665092
Re: [websec] #60: Well Known URIs vs Response HeadersRe: [websec] #60: Well Known URIs vs Response Headers
Tobias Gondrom
2013-07-31
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/9G4KE7gP7t91nd50AW2svEhmbgw/
1505204
1665092
Re: [websec] #54: Specify a report-only modeRe: [websec] #54: Specify a report-only mode
Ryan Sleevi
2012-10-19
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/KI9pwz_xAQm_2inAKQOnODlvAMg/
1504880
1665169
Re: [websec] Coordinating Frame-Options and CSP UI Safety directivesRe: [websec] Coordinating Frame-Options and CSP UI Safety directives
Adam Barth
2012-09-04
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/Xm0A__RT2ocHDTx50mvYV1IjtUU/
1504833
1665212
Re: [websec] Coordinating Frame-Options and CSP UI Safety directivesRe: [websec] Coordinating Frame-Options and CSP UI Safety directives
David Ross
2012-09-04
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/o4LHzPq_raFOj4zPsM-Fm9AYXwQ/
1504832
1665212
Re: [websec] Coordinating Frame-Options and CSP UI Safety directivesRe: [websec] Coordinating Frame-Options and CSP UI Safety directives
Adam Barth
2012-09-03
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/eKAajH8Bhq12FRepbJL8x8m4qe8/
1504831
1665212
Re: [websec] Coordinating Frame-Options and CSP UI Safety directivesRe: [websec] Coordinating Frame-Options and CSP UI Safety directives
Thomas Roessler
2012-07-20
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/pk3GxSQieDh7Z2Ub2uDB9SiWT6U/
1504752
1665212
Re: [websec] Coordinating Frame-Options and CSP UI Safety directivesRe: [websec] Coordinating Frame-Options and CSP UI Safety directives
David Ross
2012-07-19
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/Ooc_wAOjS0OLRolgWm_6vH5mROw/
1504751
1665212
Re: [websec] Coordinating Frame-Options and CSP UI Safety directivesRe: [websec] Coordinating Frame-Options and CSP UI Safety directives
Adam Barth
2012-07-18
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/kUlJwSInQjRcRbaa3NWfMEo9pz8/
1504749
1665212
Re: [websec] Coordinating Frame-Options and CSP UI Safety directivesRe: [websec] Coordinating Frame-Options and CSP UI Safety directives
Tobias Gondrom
2012-07-09
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/fVGVCmyIMKMvTdsp1lT4X2X9my0/
1504721
1665212
Re: [websec] Coordinating Frame-Options and CSP UI Safety directivesRe: [websec] Coordinating Frame-Options and CSP UI Safety directives
Tobias Gondrom
2012-07-09
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/veD8kxWztkY8FEbbIpuzsJkBgVk/
1504719
1665212
Re: [websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-frame-options-00.txtRe: [websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-frame-options-00.txt
Tobias Gondrom
2012-07-06
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/L1dsKAAKzpEbofTqkFr211zCtV4/
1504707
1665214
[websec] Comments on "I am testing HSTS"-directive and Issue #41 add parameter "hardfail=no"?[websec] Comments on "I am testing HSTS"-directive and Issue #41 add parameter "hardfail=no"?
Tobias Gondrom
2012-06-18
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/PtgmdGRrhbl9Dh1hvFc1hpj-r0s/
1504673
1665225
Re: [websec] Frame-Options: Why a header and not a CSP directive?Re: [websec] Frame-Options: Why a header and not a CSP directive?
=JeffH
2012-05-04
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/8K62ixl-mkoCk1MhfS17F-mdFhg/
1504626
1665238
Re: [websec] Frame-Options: Why a header and not a CSP directive?Re: [websec] Frame-Options: Why a header and not a CSP directive?
Adam Barth
2012-05-04
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/d5ubvQIU0hTvXfqyiab3r1jHiw8/
1504622
1665238
Re: [websec] Frame-Options: Why a header and not a CSP directive?Re: [websec] Frame-Options: Why a header and not a CSP directive?
Julian Reschke
2012-05-04
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/i_kUMNyVpCmZ_ndxBN9ZnapoCgY/
1504618
1665238
[websec] Frame-Options: Why a header and not a CSP directive?[websec] Frame-Options: Why a header and not a CSP directive?
Adam Barth
2012-05-03
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/Ac475T7rz4mfjkj0vmuyLP6hAyc/
1504615
1665238
[saag] WebSec summary IETF 83[saag] WebSec summary IETF 83
Alexey Melnikov
2012-03-28
saag
None
/arch/msg/saag/CFPTkKee0T7VGB6GFce_eHiskI0/
1268438
1590250
[websec] websec meeting in Paris - agenda topics?[websec] websec meeting in Paris - agenda topics?
Tobias Gondrom
2012-03-19
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/3RwlRhfQGmkHbySspe07TGqCaOs/
1504532
1665263
I-D Action: draft-gondrom-websec-csp-header-00.txtI-D Action: draft-gondrom-websec-csp-header-00.txt
internet-drafts
2012-03-06
i-d-announce
None
/arch/msg/i-d-announce/LzZjmTt5ParBafOVGERWDU6FWzs/
541240
1200601
Re: [websec] meeting in Prague - agenda topics?Re: [websec] meeting in Prague - agenda topics?
Tobias Gondrom
2011-02-20
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/WA1EFWyJjbIgTlMdf6CoaANXCG0/
1503700
1665445
Re: [websec] meeting in Prague - agenda topics?Re: [websec] meeting in Prague - agenda topics?
Alissa Cooper
2011-02-18
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/5N0XqpywCdmSl95KgCjVqdgBaMU/
1503699
1665445
[websec] meeting in Prague - agenda topics?[websec] meeting in Prague - agenda topics?
Tobias Gondrom
2011-02-10
websec
None
/arch/msg/websec/vixDcqfmikiUY7_CvKvn8LlaAYo/
1503697
1665445