Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 24
Meadhbh Hamrick
2011-03-31
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/7lUyoyXhvMZL-GFcSdg_qSrac68/
1500637
1664270
Re: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working groupRe: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working group
Izzy Alanis
2011-03-27
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/Y3JIsCjUN3KU0ih7XuzKA0uJh54/
1500550
1664280
Re: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working groupRe: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working group
Meadhbh Hamrick
2011-03-26
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/A9SO4Qc0Aq0SNsSYvX0_ZfLHeRc/
1500545
1664280
Re: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working groupRe: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working group
Izzy Alanis
2011-03-26
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/8XYpCyidTiKV84j9K2QyqDCxa7s/
1500543
1664280
Re: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working groupRe: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working group
Meadhbh Hamrick
2011-03-26
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/uV5irJWz1d71wSDWOyth5n8B3nU/
1500542
1664280
Re: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working groupRe: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working group
Meadhbh Hamrick
2011-03-26
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/SocWKNPGcg7gnkJouWr6CH4nVuA/
1500541
1664280
Re: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working groupRe: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working group
Izzy Alanis
2011-03-26
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/qJvoOvl24W9isKGr0hW9qT2I9xI/
1500540
1664280
Re: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working groupRe: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working group
Meadhbh Hamrick
2011-03-25
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/PcAwAn2osbEChQEvZaw4E3I8nJc/
1500528
1664280
Re: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working groupRe: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working group
Meadhbh Hamrick
2011-01-21
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/wKCgDm2u3Ydf7dlnWvnkqnTGnHc/
1500510
1664280
Re: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working groupRe: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working group
Morgaine
2011-01-19
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/CR4GAdf_UhQXxKOHSrqsiDPUuyk/
1500504
1664280
[vwrap] text serialization of DSD objects (the application/dsd+text content type)[vwrap] text serialization of DSD objects (the application/dsd+text content type)
Meadhbh Hamrick
2011-01-16
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/x7B2UpVRqt991ifS6AZUEy9ZGBg/
1500497
1664277
Re: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working groupRe: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working group
Meadhbh Hamrick
2011-01-16
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/8wpONAlzZHwp7nhhWSbXzElr7Dc/
1500493
1664280
Re: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working groupRe: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working group
Vaughn Deluca
2011-01-15
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/ztql_VLX8HZ0yd8DQ_oUQCWsv8Q/
1500492
1664280
Re: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working groupRe: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working group
Meadhbh Hamrick
2011-01-15
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/ZnZyEPRFevfXvKTTX56yeEKDCj4/
1500490
1664280
Re: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working groupRe: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working group
Vaughn Deluca
2011-01-15
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/XTejzJAxEMET_x1g4rH6XhelWbU/
1500489
1664280
Re: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working groupRe: [vwrap] Status and future of the VWRAP working group
Meadhbh Hamrick
2011-01-15
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/pCI2S_Qy4kFS_y48LAEyl3MED7g/
1500488
1664280
Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)
Morgaine
2010-09-24
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/Jh7YS-_Xtkh6cClVnB-vL7hbS4o/
1500425
1664288
Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)
Meadhbh Hamrick
2010-09-24
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/uRO0hrTKz7H75n1xMJQhokSb7S8/
1500422
1664288
Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)
Hurliman, John
2010-09-24
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/k6_OQkztxA4ma-Kya_687y3B6nE/
1500421
1664288
Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)
Meadhbh Hamrick
2010-09-24
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/tooQ4Btqu779ArOJDkS5Pt968Ck/
1500420
1664288
Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)
Meadhbh Hamrick
2010-09-24
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/TaxqMd-w2WLxsStdlUXG6bApRec/
1500418
1664288
Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)
Meadhbh Hamrick
2010-09-24
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/ZuNNyT9SHEWu6MmfTlQM5iCpet8/
1500417
1664288
Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)
Meadhbh Hamrick
2010-09-24
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/ORiQBwIoyBjR4M5Illv1H41gmlg/
1500415
1664288
Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)Re: [vwrap] Why are we standardizing the login handshake? (was RE: one question)
Meadhbh Hamrick
2010-09-24
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/0a9xywROpo7PVm0HYJnXO2GvGLQ/
1500413
1664288
Re: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocolRe: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocol
Morgaine
2010-09-22
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/JXm4zjv5nOVAHi-O0omvNEnRb8w/
1500332
1664293
Re: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocolRe: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocol
Meadhbh Hamrick
2010-09-22
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/fgBYkhfrPe481jHBdw_x7PvL7Uc/
1500324
1664293
Re: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocolRe: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocol
Morgaine
2010-09-22
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/xRnIR_xE9d2iRhDGuD5Up59T4jw/
1500315
1664293
Re: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocolRe: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocol
Meadhbh Hamrick
2010-09-22
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/A1BhfJmtfc47-fvoPJLppmRG-fU/
1500310
1664293
Re: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocolRe: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocol
kevin.tweedy
2010-09-22
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/HGOBDWbm6fRcCVIBQ7eckGK0KH8/
1500308
1664293
Re: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocolRe: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocol
Mike Dickson
2010-09-22
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/0rkSzyg14gbTi6LNjAlf6wCPt84/
1500306
1664293
Re: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocolRe: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocol
Cristina Videira Lopes
2010-09-22
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/VhopMWxWCNQJOsPeY69S5OmWf74/
1500305
1664293
Re: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocolRe: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocol
Morgaine
2010-09-22
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/Ne74ziG0Sv1GdxrmaH0b-WYhBAU/
1500302
1664293
Re: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocolRe: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocol
Cristina Videira Lopes
2010-09-22
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/rwyPqcplGLebYVlYMmqd-QN9FZM/
1500301
1664293
Re: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocolRe: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocol
Meadhbh Hamrick
2010-09-22
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/KatUqq0Y0WOeb2tA-v44w87-ypM/
1500300
1664293
Re: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocolRe: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocol
Cristina Videira Lopes
2010-09-22
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/NOt1-OEuPuqVQyfqBmWg2CXyOK4/
1500298
1664293
Re: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocolRe: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocol
Morgaine
2010-09-22
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/t8aaiIVJilMFjCLP9J6F4CV_NfI/
1500297
1664293
Re: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocolRe: [vwrap] Consensus? What exactly should be in the protocol
Cristina Videira Lopes
2010-09-22
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/oxHzCuJ-xW1W7WXz0Ur61aCjoIg/
1500296
1664293
Re: [vwrap] Call for a vote on interop BETWEEN independent virtual worlds or notRe: [vwrap] Call for a vote on interop BETWEEN independent virtual worlds or not
Meadhbh Hamrick
2010-09-21
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/226t-XE900aLKCsb1y3xiR_K4N4/
1500280
1664294
Re: [vwrap] Call for a vote on interop BETWEEN independent virtual worlds or notRe: [vwrap] Call for a vote on interop BETWEEN independent virtual worlds or not
Jonathan Freedman
2010-09-20
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/roGoNth75eXKXwppYWUeWFkiIeU/
1500256
1664294
Re: [vwrap] Call for a vote on interop BETWEEN independent virtual worlds or notRe: [vwrap] Call for a vote on interop BETWEEN independent virtual worlds or not
Meadhbh Hamrick
2010-09-20
vwrap
None
/arch/msg/vwrap/7Aba5PlKGl5bxiyXqmAoTADRKUo/
1500254
1664294
166 Messages