Re: [E-impact] [OPSAWG] side meeting #119: Power Metrics: concrete usage exampleRe: [E-impact] [OPSAWG] side meeting #119: Power Metrics: concrete usage example
Hesham ElBakoury
2024-03-27
e-impact
None
/arch/msg/e-impact/PUClGs0UsW9mIbiR_7caXKs5AH4/
3442758
2126423
Re: [E-impact] [OPSAWG] side meeting #119: Power Metrics: concrete usage exampleRe: [E-impact] [OPSAWG] side meeting #119: Power Metrics: concrete usage example
Michael Welzl
2024-03-27
e-impact
None
/arch/msg/e-impact/e1MmeJKHHDGsFHkjhStqK_XgMSo/
3442743
2126423
Re: [E-impact] [OPSAWG] side meeting #119: Power Metrics: concrete usage exampleRe: [E-impact] [OPSAWG] side meeting #119: Power Metrics: concrete usage example
Rob Wilton (rwilton)
2024-03-27
e-impact
None
/arch/msg/e-impact/_Iz9kQR8w2-YVi1Iv_MDYvIMXOY/
3442740
2126423
Re: [E-impact] [OPSAWG] side meeting #119: Power Metrics: concrete usage exampleRe: [E-impact] [OPSAWG] side meeting #119: Power Metrics: concrete usage example
Michael Welzl
2024-03-26
e-impact
None
/arch/msg/e-impact/m0NCMVteGyXtUH1fx9e0MAK-CyQ/
3442555
2126423
Re: [E-impact] [OPSAWG] side meeting #119: Power Metrics: concrete usage exampleRe: [E-impact] [OPSAWG] side meeting #119: Power Metrics: concrete usage example
Dirk Trossen
2024-03-26
e-impact
None
/arch/msg/e-impact/hEA2I3KZE1WtUd1oLQv1IdUklZ4/
3442549
2126423
Re: [IPv6] Node requirements freshness?Re: [IPv6] Node requirements freshness?
Bob Hinden
2024-01-03
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/XD9m0ZJdK0wU-vn-74O-0UFfpo0/
3401126
2106471
Re: [IPv6] Node requirements freshness?Re: [IPv6] Node requirements freshness?
Brian E Carpenter
2024-01-03
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/NYqikOKvsGFqvoSX17zQ-ZExWMk/
3401037
2106471
Re: [IPv6] Node requirements freshness?Re: [IPv6] Node requirements freshness?
john.loughney@gmail.com
2024-01-03
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/uRQaqLap6zzgJBnxEDMWuxoMKUk/
3401025
2106471
Re: [IPv6] Node requirements freshness?Re: [IPv6] Node requirements freshness?
Timothy Winters
2024-01-03
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/j-SAuj-vWzBZCZm9kpY_m5Ctslo/
3401024
2106471
Re: [IPv6] Node requirements freshness?Re: [IPv6] Node requirements freshness?
Bob Hinden
2024-01-03
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/ZFrByz-j2c9QWJkHIaEpZsoKFMw/
3401023
2106471
Re: [IPv6] Node requirements freshness?Re: [IPv6] Node requirements freshness?
Timothy Winters
2024-01-03
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/ocVYh1d3C14MiWz31jP9OO4CQ_Y/
3401022
2106471
Re: [IPv6] Node requirements freshness?Re: [IPv6] Node requirements freshness?
Bob Hinden
2024-01-03
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/BUbjNnC2uOi3jrDApXHBBkuvMmI/
3401012
2106471
Re: [IPv6] Node requirements freshness?Re: [IPv6] Node requirements freshness?
Timothy Winters
2024-01-03
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/R6owxBleyspyESXcXaGmZOZUayI/
3400858
2106471
Re: [IPv6] Node requirements freshness?Re: [IPv6] Node requirements freshness?
Tim Chown
2024-01-03
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/BgaSsnVxmssk0OpEUmzS-UNARD4/
3400725
2106471
Re: [Snac] [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis / clarification of significant prefix changeRe: [Snac] [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis / clarification of significant prefix change
Esko Dijk
2023-11-11
snac
None
/arch/msg/snac/qjD6SJhdeTkZAhhI0iNAaqmHHvw/
3382973
2097411
Re: [dhcwg] [Snac] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis / clarification of significant prefix changeRe: [dhcwg] [Snac] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis / clarification of significant prefix change
Esko Dijk
2023-11-11
dhcwg
None
/arch/msg/dhcwg/7b-q-7CbtyluD56737LTnf86QdY/
3382972
2097410
[Snac] Diffs from the SNAC IETF 118 meeting[Snac] Diffs from the SNAC IETF 118 meeting
Darren Dukes (ddukes)
2023-11-10
snac
None
/arch/msg/snac/JxjpsATc-1OhnnG6NdbNo6pI21E/
3382492
2097181
Re: [auth48] [E] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [E] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your review
Chakrabarti, Samita
2023-09-06
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/aa7ybHWczcgLzdgS6wh1iA3Pp2Q/
3352156
2077953
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your review
Sandy Ginoza
2023-09-06
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/HHDcaxSjRywlYI0vHSkbkclXmr0/
3352152
2077953
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your review
Samita Chakrabarti
2023-09-05
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/V7eDzUfYIp4kDWYCD7WbqChEh-A/
3351807
2077953
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your review
Sandy Ginoza
2023-09-05
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/GBsFz2zDIx_x6aBKe3nlZFyFsHM/
3351644
2077953
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your review
Sandy Ginoza
2023-09-01
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/JY-mucal95-FP_uiSkXbuOFqEY8/
3350525
2077953
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your review
Carles Gomez Montenegro
2023-09-01
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/h0B8b0lGHVHhvM8Ws2hwXMYvgYI/
3350375
2077953
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your review
Rashid Sangi
2023-09-01
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/GgaxD1RZZc2qmOOOwhP_TOA6pvk/
3350371
2077953
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your review
Sandy Ginoza
2023-09-01
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/JhU2SsKjm01KNPBRqY6RzrPD0mc/
3350368
2077953
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your review
최영환
2023-09-01
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/IRywppBOjfSjKIe6QuG_ukCue4c/
3350356
2077953
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your review
Yong-Geun Hong
2023-09-01
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/WfVNleXhQAmQprHvSUBMv0Jd-Zc/
3350320
2077953
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your review
Sandy Ginoza
2023-08-31
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/pyGjKpznX55Bs366031K_vqH6uQ/
3350296
2077953
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your review
Yong-Geun Hong
2023-08-24
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/zoW42iEMsqqHAdnRedfp4U89OEk/
3347124
2077953
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your review
Sandy Ginoza
2023-08-23
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/2wBlUoiCvjkSftDIr6J4Iu6gi30/
3346897
2077953
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your review
Yong-Geun Hong
2023-08-19
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/ZSpAs6WJ8ou91dCXzjY4wU3gVQ4/
3345261
2077953
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your review
Yong-Geun Hong
2023-08-15
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/t_1Zpogmtysd4Te7ZW_OHBwchJk/
3343176
2077953
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your review
Sandy Ginoza
2023-08-15
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/DotBlAM8aG7kksGhokYnCMXru3Y/
3343168
2077953
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9453 <draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-16> for your review
rfc-editor
2023-08-08
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/BeuNrTBXXxlnqBuxEOjRMoNMmHw/
3340568
2077953
Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-mopex-06Re: [Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-mopex-06
Rahul Jadhav
2023-05-31
roll
None
/arch/msg/roll/n1UkGoi-Wg7QwQi8hFS7nJv6xPg/
3314386
2063785
[Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-mopex-06[Roll] Review of draft-ietf-roll-mopex-06
Alvaro Retana
2023-05-02
roll
None
/arch/msg/roll/_3m1pKzut7k5hl3LLo7ZvH82Juc/
3306047
2063785
Re: [v6ops] Updating RFC 7084 - alternate logicRe: [v6ops] Updating RFC 7084 - alternate logic
Alexandre Petrescu
2022-12-05
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/kaFHpJB-VhHfIPZDqCIoajZOiwA/
3254424
2040257
Re: [v6ops] Updating RFC 7084 - alternate logicRe: [v6ops] Updating RFC 7084 - alternate logic
Esko Dijk
2022-12-05
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/Ck_VK3rDFi1npPHTAySsUylDLVc/
3254356
2040257
[Newsclips] IETF SYN-ACK Newspack 2022-09-26[Newsclips] IETF SYN-ACK Newspack 2022-09-26
David Goldstein
2022-09-26
newsclips
None
/arch/msg/newsclips/FX3xA5H5ag1AvltoEm9E68GKpIo/
3226779
2030775
Re: [Snac] Last call on SNAC draft charter ?Re: [Snac] Last call on SNAC draft charter ?
Ted Lemon
2022-09-01
snac
None
/arch/msg/snac/NCyllpRr_nHPCv_xdMUUtGEWG_M/
3218359
2026978
963 Messages