Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-07-13
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/0vZP-3zhHsCI9DJVZrVLnt9OvX4/
3329805
2070143
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your review
Sabine Randriamasy (Nokia)
2023-07-11
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/MhlJ5K8JxzGAGmADqJdCw2pp890/
3328471
2070143
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your review
Dhruv Dhody
2023-07-11
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/FsYe_up-8E0pGWD17cg1bXy4ILs/
3328438
2070143
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-07-11
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/5WdhAFaTEBh5JNYaiJm55MLk6DQ/
3328429
2070143
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-07-07
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/xrOdyslrfaHhQaDnFGB8n56lf9E/
3326305
2070143
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your review
Dhruv Dhody
2023-07-07
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/YAhn5CrcQCwm00gJT8bka3bFXHA/
3326280
2070143
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-07-07
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/YaFYVSVs_clibggUA4ucL-J_WO0/
3326261
2070143
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your review
Dhruv Dhody
2023-07-07
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/gd554PbD1T0E8PK77wUepOB9sGs/
3326258
2070143
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your review
Sabine Randriamasy (Nokia)
2023-07-07
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/KQO8ffKbsalqAv_ouV3M9VVU5QI/
3326249
2070143
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your review
mohamed.boucadair
2023-07-07
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/XU_UK1RhojBGPRyTLHx8Dk23i4Y/
3326247
2070143
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-07-07
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/MHsnusVVgz6u5SO68c9XguYyV-Y/
3326237
2070143
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your review
Sabine Randriamasy (Nokia)
2023-07-07
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/brNdIWEj4Nv6rNv0wMntkv8vja4/
3326132
2070143
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your review
Dhruv Dhody
2023-07-07
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/k1Mn7JCtvGXe_732XvGzuyLQhbo/
3326024
2070143
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-07-06
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/ehpquUj9NTxHAJJ_EzTUK_VG8so/
3325847
2070143
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your review
Y. Richard Yang
2023-07-05
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/3iRiPKz1nzOZJHkAzbgvBCQNnOg/
3325168
2070143
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your review
Qin Wu
2023-07-04
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/v6Mygw2sdJHtDMTUhIl72dqI1PE/
3324650
2070143
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your review
Qin Wu
2023-07-04
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/I-6NF-LVUmc7avGDWTEMt4XzgM0/
3324642
2070143
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9439 <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-28> for your review
rfc-editor
2023-06-23
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/dgxip6eCjwkp6p4q-6FZ9TrQ234/
3321090
2070143
Re: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-protocol-01.txtRe: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-protocol-01.txt
MORTON JR., AL
2022-02-25
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/b9_1PDUP83-Ln5t1YRzRjlfFhKw/
3124943
1992884
[ippm] October Summary and reply on IP Capacity [was: RE: September Summary on Max IP-Layer Capacity Metric][ippm] October Summary and reply on IP Capacity [was: RE: September Summary on Max IP-Layer Capacity Metric]
MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
2019-11-04
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/0glyY30v1VaLpOFehamLz_B4T58/
2800606
1865492
Re: [ippm] September Summary on Max IP-Layer Capacity MetricRe: [ippm] September Summary on Max IP-Layer Capacity Metric
MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
2019-10-19
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/W7C0tuYJA3A5HN3M-T3PjIxO5nE/
2792959
1859787
Re: [ippm] September Summary on Max IP-Layer Capacity MetricRe: [ippm] September Summary on Max IP-Layer Capacity Metric
Ruediger.Geib
2019-10-18
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/JMPmeU97KYXfSOhOLm1MJnebjMY/
2792452
1859787
Re: [ippm] September Summary on Max IP-Layer Capacity MetricRe: [ippm] September Summary on Max IP-Layer Capacity Metric
Matt Mathis
2019-10-18
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/3H9fqTquIlQJbl8SVPa1Ko6uaLQ/
2792425
1859787
Re: [ippm] September Summary on Max IP-Layer Capacity MetricRe: [ippm] September Summary on Max IP-Layer Capacity Metric
MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
2019-10-09
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/LDeJ4xk1CdNqmFoU6hLJ4QqmWu4/
2789091
1859787
Re: [ippm] September Summary on Max IP-Layer Capacity MetricRe: [ippm] September Summary on Max IP-Layer Capacity Metric
Joachim Fabini
2019-10-09
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/w9JA-NrXSmapJFc7w2h5ojjhfdE/
2788746
1859787
Re: [ippm] September Summary on Max IP-Layer Capacity MetricRe: [ippm] September Summary on Max IP-Layer Capacity Metric
MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
2019-10-07
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/VoVCL2IHsHbIHQwDTtLi-LR354A/
2788045
1859787
[ippm] September Summary on Max IP-Layer Capacity Metric[ippm] September Summary on Max IP-Layer Capacity Metric
MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
2019-09-29
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/Dwufxbd8-gxSyfreaOfWYLA7J_0/
2785345
1859787
[ippm] New Liaison Statement, "Reply to ITU-T SG12 LS - Harmonization of IP Capacity and Latency"[ippm] New Liaison Statement, "Reply to ITU-T SG12 LS - Harmonization of IP Capacity and Latency"
Liaison Statement Management Tool
2019-04-25
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/cgw_y-oTnqTVR9FXVNDfQo-AgFA/
2724594
1838385
Re: [ippm] New Liaison Statement, "LS - Harmonization of IP Capacity and Latency Parameters: Revision of Draft Rec. Y.1540 on IP packet transfer performance parameters and New Annex A with Lab Evaluation Plan"Re: [ippm] New Liaison Statement, "LS - Harmonization of IP Capacity and Latency Parameters: Revision of Draft Rec. Y.1540 on IP packet transfer performance parameters and New Annex A with Lab Evaluation Plan"
Greg Mirsky
2019-03-28
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/2sKbv16C9MrBewlcFyU1H8JH6rk/
2713489
1832500
Re: [ippm] New Liaison Statement, "LS - Harmonization of IP Capacity and Latency Parameters: Revision of Draft Rec. Y.1540 on IP packet transfer performance parameters and New Annex A with Lab Evaluation Plan"Re: [ippm] New Liaison Statement, "LS - Harmonization of IP Capacity and Latency Parameters: Revision of Draft Rec. Y.1540 on IP packet transfer performance parameters and New Annex A with Lab Evaluation Plan"
MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
2019-03-28
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/3pNg6vMcDLc0b5kRbrmZuFZY9Dg/
2713474
1832500
Re: [mpls-tp] Impossible requirements in the MPLS-TP OAM requirements draft? (was: Concerns regarding draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-00)Re: [mpls-tp] Impossible requirements in the MPLS-TP OAM requirements draft? (was: Concerns regarding draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-00)
Maarten Vissers
2009-11-12
mpls-tp
None
/arch/msg/mpls-tp/XLzup3FTd7Kcz4A1Z1mEoDpQ458/
980426
1503443
Re: [mpls-tp] Impossible requirements in the MPLS-TP OAM requirements draft? (was: Concerns regarding draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-00)Re: [mpls-tp] Impossible requirements in the MPLS-TP OAM requirements draft? (was: Concerns regarding draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-00)
Riccardo Martinotti
2009-11-11
mpls-tp
None
/arch/msg/mpls-tp/RWq0OejxlZ03K6liicWWHP166Gw/
980413
1503443
Re: [mpls-tp] Impossible requirements in the MPLS-TP OAM requirements draft? (was: Concerns regarding draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-00)Re: [mpls-tp] Impossible requirements in the MPLS-TP OAM requirements draft? (was: Concerns regarding draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-00)
Maarten Vissers
2009-11-10
mpls-tp
None
/arch/msg/mpls-tp/gQyORrTcXpVC8VJczhpLuVQ-_so/
980385
1503443
[mpls-tp] R: Impossible requirements in the MPLS-TP OAM requirements draft? (was: Concerns regarding draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-00)[mpls-tp] R: Impossible requirements in the MPLS-TP OAM requirements draft? (was: Concerns regarding draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-00)
Riccardo Martinotti
2009-11-10
mpls-tp
None
/arch/msg/mpls-tp/1miX93lMPUaXG4p3gLwp5402qJY/
980384
1503443
Re: [mpls-tp] Impossible requirements in the MPLS-TP OAM requirements draft? (was: Concerns regarding draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-00)Re: [mpls-tp] Impossible requirements in the MPLS-TP OAM requirements draft? (was: Concerns regarding draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-00)
Maarten Vissers
2009-11-10
mpls-tp
None
/arch/msg/mpls-tp/uaGd-rxw9I5NSmcCCwNDGyJnLrQ/
980377
1503443
Re: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-DsRe: Polling for Adoption of Ethernet I-Ds
Tomohiro Otani
2008-04-01
ccamp
None
/arch/msg/ccamp/TKF7DujG7fL0JLLMxvEBtT2hxuE/
279759
1097341
RFC 5136 on Defining Network CapacityRFC 5136 on Defining Network Capacity
rfc-editor
2008-02-12
ietf-announce
None
/arch/msg/ietf-announce/p6qIdWktiByu3ce8xYMlKNxjyBE/
667116
1373733
[rfc-dist] RFC 5136 on Defining Network Capacity[rfc-dist] RFC 5136 on Defining Network Capacity
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
2008-02-12
rfc-dist
None
/arch/msg/rfc-dist/gQ6wypfpA0rYyzqyyPN2C6-og8I/
2271996
1571123
[ippm] RFC 5136 on Defining Network Capacity[ippm] RFC 5136 on Defining Network Capacity
rfc-editor
2008-02-12
ippm
None
/arch/msg/ippm/yJE-17V9Jg_zCn6Ca6bes8msbQ8/
764824
1427233
Re: [BEHAVE] TURN Issue #1: Bandwidth ParamRe: [BEHAVE] TURN Issue #1: Bandwidth Param
Jonathan Rosenberg
2007-12-14
behave
None
/arch/msg/behave/iAuqNb47Coqn9_1uwhLElpbNfFU/
247401
1086235