Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
Livio Zanol Puppim
2012-08-08
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/GGAG9VpvmiOfpzRZzmH44WrAsc8/
1488968
1660258
Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
Ronald Bonica
2012-08-08
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/yCGw0kT7JhIw3uS-fIM5Vm-H1Yk/
1488973
1660258
Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
Fred Baker (fred)
2012-08-08
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/HyjS8nEKgBufaaYef5EZIYKJBhE/
1488972
1660258
Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
Ronald Bonica
2012-08-08
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/BTcIdagtUsaZYyfa6G5NjbrjWcQ/
1488971
1660258
Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
Benoit Claise
2012-08-08
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/NjPl_q8UjMBoRe-gnbSOYy_J4wg/
1488970
1660258
Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
Livio Zanol Puppim
2012-08-07
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/IdpvDYwtmZsY_EwzFp-xLDcvp7Q/
1488911
1660258
Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
Ronald Bonica
2012-08-07
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/ZXEFNqrRzdKeBp1KiCtJC1acOTw/
1488912
1660258
Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
Alice Russo
2012-08-07
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/WmE2NCQYgPLdHKJxycj3xj51vsA/
1488910
1660258
Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
Ronald Bonica
2012-08-07
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/9bpX6tnAwZeTOP5S1FAuSRExnco/
1488907
1660258
Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
Brian E Carpenter
2012-08-07
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/jji-OD5_YwAy65wsL9gJWwaPihM/
1488906
1660258
Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
Fred Baker (fred)
2012-08-07
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/juXiK2Gz8nk7MMX5syfSImqhVVw/
1488903
1660258
Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
HahnC
2012-08-07
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/QeBX4lzsX4BNPJphtPHefCrUyFM/
1488902
1660258
Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
2012-08-07
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/hVW-rq7RxO5ZOu3IZlxL5u3wVhs/
1488901
1660258
Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
joel jaeggli
2012-08-07
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/OWP7bTOaIo172oSj4uXgJbRU3uQ/
1488900
1660258
Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
Fred Baker (fred)
2012-08-06
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/dU1_6CyHnVf0paT2wFmHVmcOY34/
1488898
1660258
[v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)[v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
RFC Errata System
2012-08-06
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/5zxP6iZqjRfOENVJ9JtkssPNYsM/
1488867
1660258
RFC 5375 on IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment ConsiderationsRFC 5375 on IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations
rfc-editor
2008-12-04
ietf-announce
None
/arch/msg/ietf-announce/kgHUDjjO7iC6US-8JAY-SI2iQKc/
668033
1372862
[rfc-dist] RFC 5375 on IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations[rfc-dist] RFC 5375 on IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
2008-12-04
rfc-dist
None
/arch/msg/rfc-dist/Xty4gP27nh_X2oRRB0muJxFAkd8/
2272242
1570879
Updated agendaUpdated agenda
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
2008-11-16
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/7QNYWiSH2J2eNXKYQyO6S1zwXuQ/
1476332
1662207
Document Action: 'IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations' to Informational RFCDocument Action: 'IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations' to Informational RFC
The IESG
2008-10-09
ietf-announce
None
/arch/msg/ietf-announce/d637qA5kfeQCMu9R_xNQJORekUg/
667847
1373034
Re: v6ops-addcon and longer than 64 bit prefixesRe: v6ops-addcon and longer than 64 bit prefixes
Jari Arkko
2008-10-07
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/QD2wUw2dMmrDC2tzrGNvbEdn-0A/
795402
1438817
Re: v6ops-addcon and longer than 64 bit prefixesRe: v6ops-addcon and longer than 64 bit prefixes
Jari Arkko
2008-10-07
ipngwg
None
/arch/msg/ipngwg/jHhrksZ5bHqhD26N2jJY-aOqFX8/
757219
1417576
Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?
Alexandru Petrescu
2008-10-03
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/ED21Ur3svpOd_a9sECN9PbzV-Vc/
795378
1438817
Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?
Alexandru Petrescu
2008-10-03
ipngwg
None
/arch/msg/ipngwg/n6LlcA0h63KIGp3ccWsglZ8fupI/
757195
1417576
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?
Dunn, Jeffrey H.
2008-10-03
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/-MBeeQdOl4XEG-gsBbha3oqaKEI/
795375
1438817
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?
Dunn, Jeffrey H.
2008-10-03
ipngwg
None
/arch/msg/ipngwg/ig3Nsd2uGW0Foy5dgsYbtyNnBMg/
757192
1417576
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?
TJ
2008-10-02
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/A8GyKwf3pM8rKG0oVZuft0Gbiak/
795368
1438817
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?
TJ
2008-10-02
ipngwg
None
/arch/msg/ipngwg/sgncshEtH1R32dRunyOh9J8SJwk/
757185
1417576
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?
Dunn, Jeffrey H.
2008-10-02
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/bLVXtOTP8M8_YNwl9mzmTFwsQpA/
795363
1438817
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?
Dunn, Jeffrey H.
2008-10-02
ipngwg
None
/arch/msg/ipngwg/V_f_dETvdMzy1EGkvJEs2ny7h4A/
757180
1417576
Re: [saag] Content rights management (was: Pasi's AD notes for September 2008)Re: [saag] Content rights management (was: Pasi's AD notes for September 2008)
Paul Gleichauf
2008-10-02
saag
None
/arch/msg/saag/_KhI0_eTwmJjd0HHk2N-5XINJOM/
1267087
1590599
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?
TJ
2008-10-01
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/9XGGyqt7Lp_hg3Kb6yy-DJr83u8/
795349
1438817
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?
TJ
2008-10-01
ipngwg
None
/arch/msg/ipngwg/rtQvatGnigeDbJt3JgJd-0ET9OY/
757166
1417576
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?
Dunn, Jeffrey H.
2008-10-01
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/O_Og5WOJ_KanRnqXxuOsZbboZec/
795348
1438817
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?
Dunn, Jeffrey H.
2008-10-01
ipngwg
None
/arch/msg/ipngwg/X56auPNft_o5LUzNTOiW7w9GmlQ/
757165
1417576
RE: Why would anyone want to use a 64 bit interface identifier? (was: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?)RE: Why would anyone want to use a 64 bit interface identifier? (was: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?)
Dunn, Jeffrey H.
2008-10-01
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/icXVYbRsBAsICwovyuFhabfW_Aw/
795335
1438817
RE: Why would anyone want to use a 64 bit interface identifier? (was: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?)RE: Why would anyone want to use a 64 bit interface identifier? (was: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?)
Dunn, Jeffrey H.
2008-10-01
ipngwg
None
/arch/msg/ipngwg/trIxO6lrtAx_hPLLpwz6A94GUs4/
757152
1417576
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?
Dunn, Jeffrey H.
2008-10-01
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/lUUg8M2ablh8OlB7K2yLBphtftw/
795332
1438817
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?
Dunn, Jeffrey H.
2008-10-01
ipngwg
None
/arch/msg/ipngwg/qxabqzc3NyADzW_PVNYWtJbdn_A/
757149
1417576
RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?
Azinger, Marla
2008-10-01
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/BtO3N1uPxQvHnQlJB7xLfuI2N04/
795331
1438817
119 Messages