Re: [sfc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-18.txt> (Network Service Header (NSH)) to Proposed StandardRe: [sfc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-18.txt> (Network Service Header (NSH)) to Proposed Standard
Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
2017-09-04
sfc
None
/arch/msg/sfc/VFWi_RfrmQUhFKpn3zSxZnlWh4M/
2440884
1721733
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-18.txt> (Network Service Header (NSH)) to Proposed StandardRe: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-18.txt> (Network Service Header (NSH)) to Proposed Standard
Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
2017-09-04
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/g3KhTRmq2FVDvvgRy9U6i83MgjM/
2440885
1722541
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-18.txt> (Network Service Header (NSH)) to Proposed StandardRe: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-18.txt> (Network Service Header (NSH)) to Proposed Standard
Warren Kumari
2017-09-04
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/wf__uzNZ8w2pfP5OEpBIMBO-CcQ/
2440877
1722541
Re: [sfc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-18.txt> (Network Service Header (NSH)) to Proposed StandardRe: [sfc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-18.txt> (Network Service Header (NSH)) to Proposed Standard
Warren Kumari
2017-09-04
sfc
None
/arch/msg/sfc/BQ3KECWO5ecb3YqfWJIxS-fFqH4/
2440878
1721733
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-18.txt> (Network Service Header (NSH)) to Proposed StandardRe: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-18.txt> (Network Service Header (NSH)) to Proposed Standard
Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
2017-09-01
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/kaqipSawxt-sjs7_rE2_vtpHtng/
2440158
1722541
Re: [sfc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-18.txt> (Network Service Header (NSH)) to Proposed StandardRe: [sfc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-18.txt> (Network Service Header (NSH)) to Proposed Standard
Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
2017-09-01
sfc
None
/arch/msg/sfc/tCwD0bKcpnbqphogV11-CuqjFgs/
2440159
1721733
Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Deepak Kumar (dekumar)
2016-08-10
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/q2I3f0fP_3wRDE52onLj4wdyWS4/
2249084
1525248
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Deepak Kumar (dekumar)
2016-08-10
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/XBaxmlkAk3HqB1MaMyZC7JV5QoY/
2249085
1588133
Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Greg Mirsky
2016-08-10
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/dwA95KdktffJ9i5fTfaD6o7I9RU/
2249072
1525248
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Greg Mirsky
2016-08-10
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/XDz5PhkM7smiGdO-lJOwB-Xefrs/
2249073
1588133
Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Deepak Kumar (dekumar)
2016-08-09
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/ozFF8ALERDqzLVfpOjXxd9x5wmE/
2249059
1525248
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Deepak Kumar (dekumar)
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/PmW842hos4xeupgOkY6aSl3cYbE/
2249060
1588133
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Greg Mirsky
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/ruUYKH6hGGhHcfsDBFbeB4DRdMw/
2249055
1588133
Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Greg Mirsky
2016-08-09
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/U8BrK3u5SDYr36vNgmdtjNqZM94/
2249056
1525248
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Tom Herbert
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/3PL6HLzrq5keNqva8S2pxe1pYV4/
2249050
1588133
Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Tom Herbert
2016-08-09
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/QJy7eN9DSWIJBJHUlBJKMNVYUmQ/
2249049
1525248
Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Deepak Kumar (dekumar)
2016-08-09
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/sLF3hWL1_8Q768T5ZyXoKyuW7Ls/
2249047
1525248
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Deepak Kumar (dekumar)
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/4KxDtcs_nB7FCB0f01lkoLRqkco/
2249048
1588133
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Greg Mirsky
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/RFO3gsok_p7KG5_ALBCerrW555E/
2249039
1588133
Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Greg Mirsky
2016-08-09
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/jT_kryYe08bxRFllhnvwDXLYNB8/
2249040
1525248
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/jCkn4R0C7o5abgxiu_Mvjui389E/
2249030
1588133
Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
2016-08-09
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/8vnY7cUmgOiD4u3vmndQWSHQNRc/
2249031
1525248
Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Tom Herbert
2016-08-09
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/IYp2nAGZHdv2b6Lon4uSmts5RK0/
2248970
1525248
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Tom Herbert
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/T92YqDy3KUBdMAfXIyeqPnYPtgo/
2248971
1588133
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/guQoyWRg_1umYxcKSODnfy9vYeE/
2248958
1588133
Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
2016-08-09
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/IkfuiQGkh3rUQHYcW--9LQOsD8s/
2248959
1525248
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/ANneAhsVIgIfhdsQn2jQslX5IF4/
2248955
1588133
Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [nvo3] [Rtg-ooam-dt] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
2016-08-09
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/vqI7vgOZqDbgd_fkEZYjN7nRgXk/
2248956
1525248
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Greg Mirsky
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/nMATAVt_J0hC4FkB76aj101NOEY/
2248933
1588133
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Tom Herbert
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/mr07aqu3u7Oqxnj4x4e490HdbBg/
2248927
1588133
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Greg Mirsky
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/yp8Km2rFR3e1fGVfhOotPusKmMc/
2248915
1588133
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Greg Mirsky
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/B7mUWWZByTcKxK1w5dex6wNWOJQ/
2248910
1588133
Re: [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Greg Mirsky
2016-08-09
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/kQmALZCphuQ43vyD8HHLYxYTLnY/
2248911
1525248
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Greg Mirsky
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/i6UF9vwa4kKSXwZ-AyxezY0TkSY/
2248889
1588133
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Tom Herbert
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/x54ijHE0me4FWx4BQf_Yvgu-YcQ/
2248874
1588133
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Greg Mirsky
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/gI29i6GVsvitt9CXeWkhNlNx-B4/
2248861
1588133
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Joe Touch
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/u5nqhvof4JGlKmrM9zZliyawgt4/
2248843
1588133
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Larry Kreeger (kreeger)
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/tRVhGMVu3CkhEMFMg1kKEXhRT2M/
2248630
1588133
Re: [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Larry Kreeger (kreeger)
2016-08-09
nvo3
None
/arch/msg/nvo3/xsxdDS6E1a12tGw647oeit4IUOg/
2248631
1525248
Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] [nvo3] O-bit vs. OAM as Next Protocol (Re: Consensus call on encap proposals)
Tom Herbert
2016-08-09
rtg-ooam-dt
None
/arch/msg/rtg-ooam-dt/0XHYVVsHfgmU-auwsGbvgAjQ6cg/
2248627
1588133