Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Justin Uberti
2023-11-11
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/n_Ysy6iFA-EHW_miIfjEwQq_ivM/
3383081
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Murray S. Kucherawy
2023-11-08
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/X0MVq57eiZeUptrvhVYMCuG58no/
3380915
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-10-30
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/o4vqdhns6ghr7VHHqSuheSnXA6o/
3376536
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Cullen Jennings
2023-10-29
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/1vsJ-uvQA_EQWmYOjV60wGrzXLI/
3375548
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Justin Uberti
2023-10-28
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/fEAnnOSW9MW7y1RtJOAgbEUGuwo/
3375416
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Murray S. Kucherawy
2023-10-28
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/y5lYrs3q_1UrVrQseKF8ol52x90/
3375305
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-10-27
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/zQLVJKcB4wC8sZ8xH40qIRbr968/
3375136
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Justin Uberti
2023-10-17
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/NY-PlGPdULb5OeyVWFHu9j4p5Jg/
3369262
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Sean Turner
2023-10-17
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/3fMT_ue6dKqzg9Pv47ZV0fDQ8gU/
3369259
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
rfc-editor
2023-10-10
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/Ei9HWNfzBBuU5mO1Phl3Z07UX7Y/
3366440
2089525
Re: Using QUIC to traverse NATsRe: Using QUIC to traverse NATs
Marten Seemann
2023-07-22
quic
None
/arch/msg/quic/41CYYR_O1b-sWoDbpVUraFsz8qg/
3332736
2073661
Re: Using QUIC to traverse NATsRe: Using QUIC to traverse NATs
Martin Thomson
2023-07-19
quic
None
/arch/msg/quic/jH2b8_3qqor_T0bDTIhULPYsZWc/
3331483
2073661
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Lorenzo Miniero
2022-04-04
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/G5gJ_Wu7J7SYPr96CzqGVVcgUUM/
3167009
2004575
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Maxim Sharabayko
2022-04-04
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/3chkpNByOS_1__AwvLfdwUuLWVA/
3166993
2004575
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Lorenzo Miniero
2022-03-29
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/vDCNirDaFB_0k_ZQjDPhepuVfE8/
3164802
2004575
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Maxim Sharabayko
2022-03-28
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/oXHrLGJ74bIW_QFxL0E_kYVjUr8/
3164418
2004575
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Simon Pietro Romano
2022-03-23
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/kcxVnYJR_rm6C92P4Rl3wfMexbQ/
3162327
2004575
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Maxim Sharabayko
2022-03-23
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/J6aHr2E9ZHmcyhwyL3rszAgcxM4/
3162302
2004575
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Justin Uberti
2022-03-23
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/KpKANpdrNHh8_1VrRJ3WfnSVr7g/
3162100
2004575
[Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?[Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Cullen Jennings
2022-03-22
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/S7ww0KiL0fRFN04h2AQQ6yjJjfw/
3162012
2004575
Re: [rtcweb] Referring to 5245bis or 5245?Re: [rtcweb] Referring to 5245bis or 5245?
Flemming Andreasen
2017-06-08
rtcweb
None
/arch/msg/rtcweb/XKNBgR19mEYPpYDsBsYfFN0FhTs/
2401983
1704599
Re: [rtcweb] Referring to 5245bis or 5245?Re: [rtcweb] Referring to 5245bis or 5245?
Christer Holmberg
2017-06-08
rtcweb
None
/arch/msg/rtcweb/2zu1JJGsr5K5jSDgtSQVWBkglwA/
2401852
1704599
Re: [rtcweb] Referring to 5245bis or 5245?Re: [rtcweb] Referring to 5245bis or 5245?
Eric Rescorla
2017-06-08
rtcweb
None
/arch/msg/rtcweb/80CA6Dto1phijkqI6rEqNa5S3PQ/
2401796
1704599
Re: [rtcweb] Referring to 5245bis or 5245?Re: [rtcweb] Referring to 5245bis or 5245?
Flemming Andreasen
2017-06-07
rtcweb
None
/arch/msg/rtcweb/9QnkXVEO8JI9UFvpMjz_H4DFzDw/
2401681
1704599
Re: [rtcweb] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshnessRe: [rtcweb] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
Bernard Aboba
2015-06-01
rtcweb
None
/arch/msg/rtcweb/FJgu1rNxGGr-0hmRekWHqefGSqI/
2028019
1584545
Re: [rtcweb] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshnessRe: [rtcweb] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
Martin Thomson
2015-05-22
rtcweb
None
/arch/msg/rtcweb/Grm9mkRCyXlTpXRNh8hjJfTibTk/
2023740
1584545
Re: [rtcweb] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshnessRe: [rtcweb] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
Bernard Aboba
2015-05-21
rtcweb
None
/arch/msg/rtcweb/1eVHy4tOAGa7TRDsLFxw4hCNHKI/
2023244
1584545
Re: [rtcweb] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshnessRe: [rtcweb] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
Martin Thomson
2015-05-21
rtcweb
None
/arch/msg/rtcweb/7VWSyNL0zIIcGTzLb2e_VcPU9zk/
2023231
1584545
Re: New tunnel protocolRe: New tunnel protocol
Adrien de Croy
2015-01-27
httpbisa
None
/arch/msg/httpbisa/Xxskl-DZLPatH5ncJVBNA_rPh94/
1883138
1163294
Re: New tunnel protocolRe: New tunnel protocol
Martin Thomson
2015-01-27
httpbisa
None
/arch/msg/httpbisa/LOXp4-MFws05mfED_KRf4PO_z8Q/
1883134
1163294
Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-08.txt - Some additional questionsRe: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-08.txt - Some additional questions
Martin Thomson
2014-11-21
rtcweb
None
/arch/msg/rtcweb/MYHFVydrcu9QRu2bkVgrWmIpduk/
1848233
1584710
Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-08.txt - Some additional questionsRe: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-08.txt - Some additional questions
Martin Thomson
2014-11-21
rtcweb
None
/arch/msg/rtcweb/awJydduvhu5Pi8pRfVTKfUwV_eI/
1848221
1584710
Re: [MMUSIC] Faster ICE by role reversal?Re: [MMUSIC] Faster ICE by role reversal?
Iñaki Baz Castillo
2014-07-31
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/0O1te-cjUcwbD_a0QbOtxnwPtjY/
1780082
1491384
Re: [MMUSIC] Faster ICE by role reversal?Re: [MMUSIC] Faster ICE by role reversal?
Dan Wing
2014-07-31
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/Y4z5iOIXaRb6m8SuQiN7dS0hXO0/
1780032
1491384
Re: [MMUSIC] Faster ICE by role reversal?Re: [MMUSIC] Faster ICE by role reversal?
Martin Thomson
2014-07-31
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/6vMZQQwNjULzJwd6ktN7WJXKdpM/
1780003
1491384
Re: draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol-00.txtRe: draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol-00.txt
Sergio Garcia Murillo
2014-06-30
httpbisa
None
/arch/msg/httpbisa/RDTrf8NhsWfFaTyFn7yJkpXODRY/
1760204
1163600
Re: draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol-00.txtRe: draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol-00.txt
Martin Thomson
2014-06-27
httpbisa
None
/arch/msg/httpbisa/Ycnnuf4JIEtZJ0ITb19jP7JoMEw/
1759789
1163600
Re: [rtcweb] Some language on "prioritization"Re: [rtcweb] Some language on "prioritization"
Karl Stahl
2014-04-23
rtcweb
None
/arch/msg/rtcweb/OGaZSZ_g5H3QO-8pSJTfhLHpms0/
1717615
1584905
Re: [rtcweb] Some language on "prioritization"Re: [rtcweb] Some language on "prioritization"
Karl Stahl
2014-04-23
rtcweb
None
/arch/msg/rtcweb/D6skBFW7uFsZJDLqUdAj_WzrEJs/
1717614
1584905
Re: [rtcweb] Some language on "prioritization"Re: [rtcweb] Some language on "prioritization"
Paul Kyzivat
2014-04-22
rtcweb
None
/arch/msg/rtcweb/7OERjmEiVjmoIckeEEjPwV8LoeU/
1717613
1584905