Re: [rfc-i] rfcNNNNN.jsonRe: [rfc-i] rfcNNNNN.json
Sandy Ginoza
2021-04-24
rfc-interest
None
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/MMhfvk4Q775b-LsZlfV4T2Au6Lc/
3026585
1950789
Re: [rfc-i] rfcNNNNN.jsonRe: [rfc-i] rfcNNNNN.json
Carsten Bormann
2021-04-23
rfc-interest
None
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/OFh4OoQSyS5sR6xG1gsdSZUtC2c/
3026541
1950789
Re: [Tools-discuss] idnits dies on draft-ietf-quic-transport-28Re: [Tools-discuss] idnits dies on draft-ietf-quic-transport-28
Henrik Levkowetz
2020-06-02
tools-discuss
None
/arch/msg/tools-discuss/3yJbcHHlJN0BcvkjZHSOla2i2BI/
2886534
1897687
Re: [Tools-discuss] idnits dies on draft-ietf-quic-transport-28Re: [Tools-discuss] idnits dies on draft-ietf-quic-transport-28
Lars Eggert
2020-06-02
tools-discuss
None
/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Mhm36Zm-lLHmgiljNpkTfg9RQVc/
2886526
1897687
Re: [tcpm] Is RFC1323bis' title still appropriate?Re: [tcpm] Is RFC1323bis' title still appropriate?
David Borman
2013-11-15
tcpm
None
/arch/msg/tcpm/cn9L39G6wkll40_jSVgjILz_rec/
1422030
1637670
Re: [tcpm] Is RFC1323bis' title still appropriate?Re: [tcpm] Is RFC1323bis' title still appropriate?
Zimmermann, Alexander
2013-11-15
tcpm
None
/arch/msg/tcpm/STOM8NV2Ui6JeaXJG51oN8QJ9Fw/
1422029
1637670
Re: [tcpm] Is RFC1323bis' title still appropriate?Re: [tcpm] Is RFC1323bis' title still appropriate?
l.wood
2013-11-15
tcpm
None
/arch/msg/tcpm/CXXmH5eMeriU6it1nQmVgeouFCs/
1422028
1637670
Re: [tcpm] Is RFC1323bis' title still appropriate?Re: [tcpm] Is RFC1323bis' title still appropriate?
David Borman
2013-11-15
tcpm
None
/arch/msg/tcpm/MqdFLHO1F1ZHvLhDMaMBt072r4c/
1422027
1637670
Re: [tcpm] Is RFC1323bis' title still appropriate?Re: [tcpm] Is RFC1323bis' title still appropriate?
Scheffenegger, Richard
2013-11-14
tcpm
None
/arch/msg/tcpm/EnKemLmz5dJ_113qqzXaoVH5orA/
1422025
1637670
Re: [tcpm] Is RFC1323bis' title still appropriate?Re: [tcpm] Is RFC1323bis' title still appropriate?
Ilpo Järvinen
2013-11-14
tcpm
None
/arch/msg/tcpm/X1GgA_QVG2_386ZUxhN-Y0T0l_g/
1422024
1637670
Re: [Tsvwg] TCP Question: Reuse of TCB's in time-wait state:Re: [Tsvwg] TCP Question: Reuse of TCB's in time-wait state:
Joe Touch
2001-10-25
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/6EmYSdrTFbIDEnPF940CmsVE44w/
1454624
1654469
Re: [Tsvwg] TCP Question: Reuse of TCB's in time-wait state:Re: [Tsvwg] TCP Question: Reuse of TCB's in time-wait state:
sanjay kaniyar
2001-10-25
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/3FohrRBadsYwiP2GBtQDL6LBA50/
1454623
1654469
Re: [Tsvwg] TCP Question: Reuse of TCB's in time-wait state:Re: [Tsvwg] TCP Question: Reuse of TCB's in time-wait state:
Joe Touch
2001-10-24
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/g0RmZi2_eeKb-0qm3R8nnnh5ezM/
1454619
1654469
Re: TCP sequence numbersRe: TCP sequence numbers
Bob Braden
2000-09-19
tcpimpl
None
/arch/msg/tcpimpl/9QuJBi1N4smCjlx32-xag9ihatk/
2950994
1920690
14 Messages