Re: [apps-discuss] Working Group Last Call ondraft-ietf-appsawg-multipart-form-data

Saving the RFC Editor a little work mostly

s.4

/there are a generally series of fields,/there are generally aseries of
fields,/

' restricting field names to ASCII  will help avoid some
interoperability issues.'
worth making a SHOULD?

s.5.1

/Each field's form data of the form is /Each field's form data is/

/prepared to acommodate./prepared to accommodate./

s.5.3

Should there be a reference for '"file:" URI' or has that been omitted
because there is no good one:-(

s.5.6
/In the case where the form data text,/  In the case where the form data
is text,/

s.8
I think that the Security Considerations should be stronger about
protecting the privacy of confidential information

s.9
The registration has two references to this document - these should
probably be called out as RFCxxxx with the usual note to replace xxxx
with the RFC number

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Salvatore Loreto" <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
To: "IETF Apps Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 2:28 PM

Hi there,

I am acting as shepherd for the appsawg-mutlipart-form-data

The wg lc for this draft has been issued on September 16, but since then
nobody has sent
any comment/feedback to the list.

We really need people reviewing this document and providing their
feedback
in order to determine if there is or not working group consensus to be
publish this draft.

best regards
Salvatore

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Murray S. Kucherawy
<superuser@gmail.com<mailto:superuser@gmail.com>>
Date: Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:09 PM
Subject: Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-appsawg-multipart-form-data
To: IETF Apps Discuss
<apps-discuss@ietf.org<mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>>

Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-appsawg-multipart-form-data

Colleagues,

This note starts a Working Group Last Call for
draft-ietf-appsawg-multipart-form-data.  The document seems to have
stabilized and I believe Larry got the help he needed in setting up test
cases he needed.

Please provide review comments or expressions of support for the current
version either on this list or privately to
draft-ietf-appsawg-multipart-form-data.all@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-i
etf-appsawg-multipart-form-data.all@tools.ietf.org> on or before October
3, 2014.  Be as detailed as possible.  The co-chairs need to determine
if the document has working group consensus, which means we need to know
people have read the latest version and agree with its content and with
the idea that it is ready to proceed.  A simple “+1” doesn’t tell us
anything.

Also, if any participant has knowledge of IPR that needs to be declared
on this work, please do so, as required by BCPs 78 and 79.

<name> is fulfilling the duties of document shepherd.

-MSK, APPSAWG co-chair

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>