Re: [Captive-portals] CAPPORT support in iOS 14 and macOS Big Sur betas

[Tommy Pauly <[e-mail]>]

> On Jul 1, 2020, at 4:22 PM, Erik Kline <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> Out of curiosity, does the implementation handle the 7710bis options'
> urn:ietf:params:capport:unrestricted value?

That doesn’t yet stop us from sending out the probe, no. That can be something added later, based on how networks adopt it.

Thanks,
Tommy

> 
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 5:00 PM Martin Thomson <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> Tommy, this is great!  Thanks for all your work here, it's good to see this turn into something concrete.
>> 
>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020, at 07:30, Tommy Pauly wrote:
>>> Hello CAPPORT,
>>> 
>>> I wanted to highlight an announcement we’ve made for the betas of iOS
>>> and macOS released today:
>>> 
>>> How to modernize your captive network
>>> <https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=q78sq5rv>
>>> 
>>> The betas for iOS and macOS support both draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis
>>> and draft-ietf-capport-api by default. This doesn’t change the user
>>> experience of logging onto captive networks, but the system will
>>> request the DHCP options and handle the RA option, and will prefer
>>> using the Captive Portal API Server interaction over having a probe
>>> that is intercepted.
>>> 
>>> If you have a portal system that is already implementing the CAPPORT
>>> features, please test out these betas and let us know if you see any
>>> issues! And if you have a captive portal solution, we’d encourage you
>>> to start supporting this soon.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Tommy
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Captive-portals mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Captive-portals mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Captive-portals mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals