IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [dns-operations] dnsop-any-notimp violates the DNS standards

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Fri, 13 March 2015 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456401A1A63 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W3D2wp5T8zw9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-f171.google.com (mail-pd0-f171.google.com [209.85.192.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE8191A03F9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pdbfl12 with SMTP id fl12so30479511pdb.9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=2hjuKupsb7V/CZKOvmR/X0T/EIr2SRmNqwB2O1jaJxo=; b=JcjkVM1odwQyPFsR4niXQThoZAgLoKp/4DarEt0TCfXXApfKAuBnGvKatSpHIVyQdx Q49MMc9dIrjPrgjl88Sjx3mk3n6O85ihrqC9CZUCPS6VOtcYTXZqDB+xUDUmZVRpXHqd xYw7rWCdjj7Y5XVL0+eAbctJlFSTX9Flabcw3VomnBxD2hR1n8RVOmQDri2iGy4W7Oq/ 5k6Vjo0cJ4/nM1GGYvu3LWL/fo/MWvXDLdg+7vQwLJhSazrMbnA6umWSmtl4fr3yNZMl ujEuOYOzEMTad/JTV+yJ9ZHdpWn/yp/Md4aT1uDfjGeVcuT0VgO4ZPAQa8VqUeMXyAI+ Um4g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnU0ys8ywE2A3JeNXTZMahIZ4pl2dER92DiMuO/qVRcYkYTICagDVkxmronRLIS7ORm6UlL
X-Received: by 10.66.228.132 with SMTP id si4mr102497254pac.134.1426269415591; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.9] ([73.162.11.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hz13sm845887pab.6.2015.03.13.10.56.54 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3D6EB451-96BB-42AD-95D0-32155FDB0136"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b5
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1503131342460.22027@bofh.nohats.ca>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:56:53 -0700
Message-Id: <BAB65E41-A2E8-4C7E-B736-680112F67DAC@virtualized.org>
References: <20150312125913.20188.qmail@cr.yp.to> <3D558422-D5DA-4434-BDED-E752BA353358@flame.org> <m27fulry37.wl%randy@psg.com> <55030A28.8050707@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <5503101F.9060205@redbarn.org> <968C470DAC25FB419E0159952F28F0C06DF659F0@MEM0200CP3XF04.ds.irsnet.gov> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1503131342460.22027@bofh.nohats.ca>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/2tfL-8dU_dmJtCWoQeY-IdPc-UU>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [dns-operations] dnsop-any-notimp violates the DNS standards
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:56:58 -0000

On Mar 13, 2015, at 10:54 AM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> 
>> DNSSEC is [...] even less finished and less deployed than IPv6.
> 
> I have to disagree with this continued claim by opponents of DNSSEC
> that it is not widely deployed.

I believe this was Paul Vixie quoting himself from 10 years ago.

Regards,
-drc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email